Sluss v. Workers' Compensation Com'r

Decision Date01 March 1985
Docket Number16458,Nos. 16457,s. 16457
Citation327 S.E.2d 413,174 W.Va. 433
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesTerry L. SLUSS v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER and U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc. Ernest G. BARBER, Jr. v. WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER and U.S. Steel Mining Company, Inc.

Syllabus by the Court

The ten-year period required to invoke the presumption provided by W.Va.Code § 23-4-8c(b) (1981) is not reduced by brief temporary absences from work on account of illness, injury, or contract strikes, which are beyond the control of the claimant.

S.F. Raymond Smith, U.M.W.A., Beckley, for appellants.

Kevin A. Nelson, Love, Wise & Woodroe, Charleston, for appellees.

BROTHERTON, Justice:

These cases are appeals from final decisions of the Workers' Compensation Appeal Board, which denied appellants, Terry L. Sluss and Ernest G. Barber, Jr., the presumption set out in W.Va.Code § 23-4-8c(b) (1981). In both cases, the State Workers' Compensation Commissioner found that the claimants were entitled to the presumption, and the Appeal Board reversed that finding. The Appeal Board held that each claimant failed to show exposure to the hazard of inhaling minute particles of dust "for a period of ten years during the fifteen years immediately preceding the date of his last exposure," where time off due to illness, injuries, and United Mine Workers strikes reduced claimants' respective periods of exposure to less than ten years. We hold that the ten-year period specified in Code § 23-4-8c(b) is not reduced by brief periods of illness, injury, or strike, all of which are beyond a claimant's control. We, therefore, reverse the decisions of the Appeal Board, and reinstate the order of the Commissioner with respect to appellant Barber. The Sluss case presents an additional factual issue, which we remand to the Commissioner for determination.

Appellant, Terry L. Sluss, was employed by respondent, U.S. Steel, from March, 1972, to April, 1982, a total period of ten years and one month. During that time, he was absent from work for approximately seven months on account of United Mine Workers' contract strikes and approximately one month due to a kidney ailment. In addition, Sluss spent approximately nine months of his employment as a wireman, which involved working outside the mine and away from the coal face when inside.

Appellant, Ernest G. Barber, Jr., was employed by U.S. Steel from January, 1971, to April, 1982, a period of eleven years and three months. During that time, he was unemployed for approximately six months, which results in a period of potential exposure of ten years and nine months. In addition, Barber was absent from work for periods totalling almost six months on account of various illnesses and injuries, and was off for approximately seven months due to United Mine Workers' contract strikes. It is not disputed that Barber's employment involved exposure to coal dust.

In both cases, the Commissioner found, in relevant part, that the claimants had been exposed to the hazards of occupational pneumoconiosis over a period of not less than ten years during the fifteen years immediately preceding the date of last exposure thereto. This entitled both claimants to the presumption set out in W.Va.Code § 23-4-8c(b) (1981), which provides:

If it can be shown that the claimant or deceased employee has been exposed to the hazard of inhaling minute particles of dust in the course of and resulting from his employment for a period of ten years during the fifteen years immediately preceding the date of his last exposure to such hazard and that such claimant or deceased employee has sustained a chronic respiratory disability, then it shall be presumed that such claimant is suffering or such deceased employee was suffering at the time of his death from occupational pneumoconiosis which arose out of and in the course of his employment. This presumption shall not be conclusive.

The employer appealed, and the Appeal Board in both cases reversed that portion of the Commissioner's orders on account of the absences noted above.

The statute requires exposure "for a period of ten years." There is no requirement that the period be continuous and the respondents do not urge such a position in this case. Their only contention is that the period of exposure should be reduced by extended absences from work, because the claimants were not exposed to dust during those periods.

Although respondents' argument has considerable logical appeal, we believe that a rule that reduced a claimant's period of exposure by brief periods of time off work for illness, injury, and contract strikes would require a technical reading of the statute that was not intended by the legislature. The statutory presumption reflects the high probability that exposure to dust over an extended period will cause respiratory disease. Without the benefit of legislative history or medical evidence, we cannot be certain how closely ten years corresponds to the actual incidence of disease. It appears to be based on a medical fact, but necessarily involves a relatively arbitrary time period. "Exposure," strictly read, would require a showing that the claimant was exposed to dust on 3,650 days, excluding weekends, vacations, etc. At the other extreme, "exposure" might require mere employment status at a mine site or other dusty location. The former position would pose an administrative nightmare, and certainly was not intended by the legislature. Similarly, we have eschewed the latter position by holding that a "hazard," as contemplated by the statute, depends on a showing that minute particles of dust exist in abnormal quantities in the work area. See Meadows v. Workmen's Compensation Comm'r, 157 W.Va. 140, 144-45, 198 S.E.2d 137, 139 (1973...

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Mayle v. Ferguson
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1985
    ... ... Their duties and compensation shall be prescribed by the court." Under this constitutional provision, ... ...
  • Rhodes v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • December 11, 2000
    ...from the evidence. Javins v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner, 173 W.Va. 747, 320 S.E.2d 119 (1984); Sluss v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner, 174 W.Va. 433, 327 S.E.2d 413 (1985)."). 6. Pursuant to W. Va.Code § 23-4-6a If an employee is found to be permanently disabled due to occupati......
  • Crouch v. West Virginia Workers' Compensation Com'r
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • March 28, 1991
    ...from the evidence. Javins v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner, 173 W.Va. 747, 320 S.E.2d 119 (1984); Sluss v. Workers' Compensation Commissioner, 174 W.Va. 433, 327 S.E.2d 413 (1985). West Virginia Code § 23-4-3 (1985) provides the parameters within which the Commissioner must operate in ......
  • State ex rel. Philyaw v. Williams
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • November 24, 1993
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT