Smith v. Lefrak Organization, Inc.
| Decision Date | 01 November 1983 |
| Citation | 469 N.Y.S.2d 693,457 N.E.2d 799,60 N.Y.2d 828 |
| Parties | , 457 N.E.2d 799 Kim Athena SMITH, an infant etc., et al., Appellants, v. LEFRAK ORGANIZATION, INC., et al., Respondents. |
| Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
OPINION OF THE COURT
On review of submissions pursuant to Rule 500.2(b) (22 NYCRR 500.2[g] ), order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division, 96 A.D.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 777. It is unnecessary for us to consider appellant's assertions that the recently enacted CPLR 2005 (L.1983, ch. 318) is applicable in this case inasmuch as plaintiff failed to submit an affidavit of merits in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Stolowitz v. Mount Sinai Hospital, 60 N.Y.2d 685, 468 N.Y.S.2d 460, 455 N.E.2d 1255 (1983); Amodeo v. Radler, 59 N.Y.2d 1001, 466 N.Y.S.2d 953, 453 N.E.2d 1242).
To continue reading
Request your trial
19 cases
-
People v. Qike
...court deem it relevant and otherwise admissible. (People v. Hughes, 124 A.D.2d 344, 347, 507 N.Y.S.2d 285 lv. denied 60 N.Y.2d 828, 469 N.Y.S.2d 693, 457 N.E.2d 799; see also, Mahoney v. Staffa, 256 A.D.2d 827, 681 N.Y.S.2d 816, 818). [Portions of opinion omitted for purposes of publication......
-
Williams v. Suttle, 2016–10118
...270 ; Lerner v. Ayervais, 16 A.D.3d 382, 790 N.Y.S.2d 607 ; Smith v. Lefrak Org., 96 A.D.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 777, affd 60 N.Y.2d 828, 469 N.Y.S.2d 693, 457 N.E.2d 799 ). The plaintiffs failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for their failure to appear for depositions on or before Februa......
-
Tewari v. Tsoutsouras
...518, 468 N.E.2d 700, supra; Smith v. Lefrak Org., 96 A.D.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 777, affd for reasons stated below 60 N.Y.2d 828, 469 N.Y.S.2d 693, 457 N.E.2d 799). Contrary to the conclusion of the Appellate Division, failure to timely file the CPLR 3406(a) notice is not analogous to a plead......
-
Gibbs v. St. Barnabas Hosp.
...N.E.2d 188; see also Smith v. Lefrak Org., 96 A.D.2d 859, 465 N.Y.S.2d 777 [2d Dept.1983], affd. for reasons stated 60 N.Y.2d 828, 469 N.Y.S.2d 693, 457 N.E.2d 799 [1983]; Amodeo v. Radler, 89 A.D.2d 594, 452 N.Y.S.2d 471 [2d Dept.1982], affd. 59 N.Y.2d 1001, 466 N.Y.S.2d 953, 453 N.E.2d 12......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
CPLR 3126 conditional orders requiring disclosure "can't get no respect".
...that such relief is available...."). (126) See supra note 121 and accompanying text. (127) See, e.g., Smith v. Lefrak Org. (Smith II), 60 N.Y.2d 828, 830, 457 N.E.2d 799, 799-800, 469 N.Y.S.2d 693, 693 (1983); Canter v. Mulnick (Canter II), 60 N.Y.2d 689, 691, 455 N.E.2d 1257, 1258, 468 N.Y......