Smith v. State
| Decision Date | 17 February 1997 |
| Docket Number | No. S96A1580,S96A1580 |
| Parties | , 97 FCDR 533 SMITH v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Sarina J. Woods, Atlanta, for Smith.
Lewis R. Slaton, Dist. Atty., Michael J. Bowers, Atty. Gen., Beth Attaway, Asst. Atty. Gen., Department of Law, and Kirby Clements, Jr., Asst. Dist. Atty., Atlanta, for the State.
This appeal is from Jimmy Lee Smith's conviction for felony murder. 1 The victim's body was found behind a dumpster. Smith's wife told the police that she saw him cut up a blood-stained square of carpet and wipe off a large stick, which she described as a baseball bat that Smith kept behind their apartment door. Based on that information, police officers searched the apartment, discovering blood stains on the floor and carpet, a hole in the carpet, blood stains on a mop and pail, and a broken window with glass inside and out. Smith was arrested for the victim's murder. Smith's wife testified that Smith told her someone had broken into the apartment and that he had shot the intruder in the leg. She also testified that Smith tried to give her a gun, but she refused it. Medical testimony indicated that the victim died as a result of three crushing wounds to the skull and that the placement of the wounds indicated that they were inflicted as the victim lay on the ground unmoving. In a statement introduced at trial, Smith told a police officer that he came home to find a burglar in his apartment; that he hit the burglar with a stick when the burglar ran toward him, then hit the burglar twice more; and that he hid the body because he did not think anyone would believe he killed the victim in self-defense.
1. Smith contends the trial court erred in denying his motion for a continuance made on the ground that a properly subpoenaed witness was absent. Defense counsel stated in her place that the witness was a police officer who would have testified that he had once arrested the victim for possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, that the baggies found in the victim's pocket were those commonly used to package cocaine, and that drug users and dealers commit burglaries.
Although the subpoenaed officer whose testimony Smith wanted was absent, another police officer testified to essentially the same facts, establishing that the victim had a pending drug charge, that the plastic bags in his pocket were those typically used to package drugs, and that many burglaries are drug-related. Gallimore v. State, 166 Ga.App. 601(1), 305 S.E.2d 164 (1983).
2. Defense counsel moved for a mistrial on the ground that Smith claimed that jurors had seen him in handcuffs outside the courtroom. However, the defense made no effort to have jurors questioned and did not pursue the matter farther than making the motion for mistrial. Under those circumstances, we find no abuse of the discretion with which trial courts are cloaked in considering a motion for mistrial on that ground. George v. State, 192 Ga.App. 840(4), 386 S.E.2d 669 (1989).
3. Smith enumerates as error the trial court's denial of his motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. "There is no error in denying a defendant's motion for directed verdict of acquittal where the evidence is sufficient to authorize a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt." Cowards v. The State, 266 Ga. 191, 465 S.E.2d 677 (1996). The evidence presented at the trial of this case, viewed in a light supporting the verdict (Anderson v. State, 245 Ga. 619(1), 266 S.E.2d 221 (1980)), showed that Smith used a piece of wood the size and shape of a baseball bat to crush the victim's skull as the victim lay on the floor. Smith's statements that the victim was an armed burglar and that Smith did not strike the victim once he was on the floor were not...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Butts v. State
...61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979); OCGA § 17-10-30(b)(2). 3. Miller v. State, 270 Ga. 741, 742(1), 512 S.E.2d 272 (1999); Smith v. State, 267 Ga. 502, 503-504(3), 480 S.E.2d 838 (1997). 4. Pope v. State, 257 Ga. 32, 34-35(2)(a), 354 S.E.2d 429 (1987) (citing United States v. Slay, 714 F.2d 1093 (11th C......
-
Wilson v. State
...the denial of the defendant's motion for a directed verdict. Miller v. State, 270 Ga. 741(1), 512 S.E.2d 272 (1999); Smith v. State, 267 Ga. 502(3), 480 S.E.2d 838 (1997). Accordingly, we disagree with Wilson's contention that his motion for a directed verdict was improperly denied by the t......
-
Fetty v. State
...and hence this enumeration is waived on appeal. Thompson v. State, 265 Ga. 677, 679, 461 S.E.2d 528 (1995).33 Smith v. State, 267 Ga. 502, 503, 480 S.E.2d 838 (1997).34 Thompson, ...
-
In re C.L.
...Under these circumstances, we find no basis for reversal based on the denial of the motion for a continuance. See Smith v. State, 267 Ga. 502, 503(1), 480 S.E.2d 838 (1997) failure to grant a continuance for testimony which is merely cumulative is not reversible error.") (citation and punct......