Smith v. Traders & General Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 15 May 1953 |
Docket Number | No. 3018,3018 |
Citation | 258 S.W.2d 436 |
Parties | SMITH et al. v. TRADERS & GENERAL INS. CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Carter, Gallagher, Roberts & Jones, Dallas, for appellants.
Strasburger, Price, Kelton, Miller & Martin, Dallas, for appellee.
Mrs. Vernice Smith, the widow of Emmett Thorne Smith, individually and as next friend for David Thorne Smith, the minor son of deceased, Emmett Thorne Smith, brought this suit against Traders & General Insurance Company for death benefits under the Workmen's Compensation Act. A jury was waived and judgment was rendered in favor of the insurance company. Plaintiffs have appealed.
The case was tried solely upon an agreed stipulation of facts which stipulations, in part, are as follows:
'That on July 6, 1951, N. H. Williams instructed Emmett Thorne Smith to accompany him to Dallas for the purpose of inspecting such equipment, and that they left their homes and place of business on the morning of July 6th and drove to Dallas in N. H. Williams' automobile. That N. H. Williams had agreed to pay and was to pay all expenses incurred by Emmett Thorne Smith in such trip to Dallas, Texas. That N. H. Williams and Emmett Thorne Smith arrived in Dallas at approximately 7:00 P.M. on July 6, 1951, and registered at the Jefferson Hotel in Dallas, Texas, and were assigned to Room 717 on the seventh floor of said hotel. That after arrival in Dallas, N. H. Williams and Emmett Thorne Smith contacted Harley Hightower and made arrangements to meet him at 8:00 A.M. on July 7, 1951, for the purpose of looking over the purchased equipment. That N. H. Williams and Emmett Thorne Smith also scheduled a truck to be at the printing shop formerly owned by Harley Hightower at 12:00 noon on July 7th for the purpose of transporting the usable equipment back to Kermit for the Winkler County News.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Therkildsen v. Fisher Beverage
...under the facts of this case. See Stewart v. Oliver B. Cannon & Son, Inc., 551 A.2d 818, 821 (Del.Super.1988) ("Since the Court in Smith was deciding a workman's compensation claim that involved the death of an employer [sic] driving a motor vehicle while intoxicated, it necessarily conside......
-
Sterling v. Mike Brown, Inc., 90-1222
...refused to apply the estoppel exception: Hopper v. F.W. Corridori Roofing Co., 305 A.2d 309 (Del.1973) and Smith v. Traders & General Insurance Co., 258 S.W.2d 436 (Tex.Ct.App.1953). In both cases the respective courts held that the statutory intoxication defense was a clear and unequivocal......
-
Blevins v. Safeway Stores
...assertion of the defense of intoxication. See Hopper v. F.W. Corridori Roofing Co., 305 A.2d 309 (Del.1973); Smith v. Traders & General Ins. Co., 258 S.W.2d 436 (Tex.Civ.App.1953). This approach has been described as "draconian." See 1 A. Larson, The Law of Workmen's Compensation § 34.36, n......
-
Hopper v. F. W. Corridori Roofing Co.
...and it must be given due recognition and implementation. The conclusion we reach here is supported by Smith v. Traders & General Ins. Co., Tex.Civ.App., 258 S.W.2d 436 (1953). There, while the employer and the employee were on a business trip, the employer initiated drinking by both in the ......