State Ex Rel. Barnett Nat. Bank of De Land v. Thursby
Citation | 112 Fla. 257,150 So. 252 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. BARNETT NAT. BANK OF DE LAND v. THURSBY et al. |
Decision Date | 06 October 1933 |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 30, 1933.
Mandamus by the State, on the relation of the Barnett National Bank of De Land, a banking association organized and existing under the banking laws of the United States of America, against Ben D. Thursby and others, as and constituting the Board of County Commissioners of Volusia County, Fla., and others.
Motion to strike portions of return to the alternative writ denied motion to quash alternative writ denied, demurrer to alternative writ overruled, and peremptory writ issued.
COUNSEL Hull, Landis & Whitehair, of De Land, for relator.
W. J Gardiner, of Daytona Beach, for respondents.
This is an original mandamus proceeding before us on returns to the alternative writ, demurrer to the alternative writ, motion to strike portions of the return, motion to quash the alternative writ, and motion for peremptory writ, the return notwithstanding.
Motions to strike portions of the returns to the alternative writ will be denied.
Motion to quash the alternative writ will be denied.
The demurrer to the alternative writ and motion for peremptory writ will be considered together.
The proceeding was instituted to compel the board of county commissioners and the clerk of the board of county commissioners, the tax assessor, and the tax collector of Volusia county to levy, assess, and collect a tax sufficient to pay the relator $6,000, and to require the payment of the proceeds of the tax to be made to the relator. Volusia County Fair Association was a nonprofit corporation organized in compliance with sections 4517-4527, inclusive, Rev. Gen. St §§ 6516-6526, inclusive, Comp. Gen. Law, and was incorporated in November, 1923, under decree of the circuit court of Volusia county. From that date until and including the year 1932, Volusia County Fair Association annually conducted the county fair in Volusia county for the purposes provided in the statute. In 1930, on the 6th day of August, the county commissioners of Volusia county adopted its annual budget of the expenses of the general fund of Volusia county aggregating a total of $134,900 to be raised for taxes to be levied in that county for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 1930, and ending September 30, 1931, and under the power and authority of the sections of the statute above mentioned the board of county commissioners included in such budget of the expenses of the general fund of Volusia county an appropriation for the said Volusia County Fair Association the sum of $6,000, for the purpose of aiding in the conduct of the fair to be held in February, 1931, which Volusia county fair was held in the month of February, 1931. After the resolution adopting the budget was passed by the board of county commissioners, about October 6, 1930, Volusia County Fair Association, being in urgent need of money to prepare for and conduct the county fair to be held in February, 1931, applied to and received from the relator a loan of $6,000 in anticipation of the receipt of the appropriation of $6,000 above referred to, and executed to the relator an assignment of the appropriation of $6,000. On the same date the board of county commissioners of Volusia county, as a part of the same transaction, approved the assignment of the appropriation by Volusia County Fair Association; the assignment and approval being in words and figures as follows:
'Witness the signatures of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Northwest Magnesite Co.
... ... lease of school grant land. From the judgment rendered, the ... State ... question was Before this court in State ex rel ... Atkinson v. Evans, 46 Wash. 219, 89 ... State ... ex rel. National Bank of Tacoma v. Tacoma, 97 Wash. 190, ... 166 ... In State v. Thursby, ... 112 Fla. 257, 150 So. 252, it was ... ...
-
City of Winter Haven v. State Ex Rel. Landis
...the property was held in a different fiduciary capacity. We have held that counties and municipalities may be estopped. In State v. Thursby, 112 Fla. 257, 150 So. 252, it held that where county commissioners had made an appropriation for a county fair and had approved an assessment from the......
-
O'Neill v. Burns
...619; appropriation of money by county commissioners to assist in holding, or to hold a county fair, State ex rel. Barnett National Bank of DeLand v. Thursby et al., 112 Fla. 257, 150 So. 252; advertising to promote the citrus industry, C. V. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus Comm., 128 Fla.......
-
Miller v. Ryan
... ... that case was that any tax imposed in the State of North Carolina for advertising purposes must ... 248, 112 A.L.R. 562; Stewart v. Thursby, 103 Fla. 990, 138 So. 742; State ex rel. Barnett ... Nat. Bank of DeLand v. Thursby, 112 Fla. 257, 150 So ... Consolidated Land Company v. Tyler, 88 Fla. 14, 101 So. 280 ... ...