State ex rel. York v. Beckham

Decision Date20 July 1948
Citation160 Fla. 810,36 So.2d 769
PartiesSTATE ex rel. YORK v. BECKHAM.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Rehearing Denied Sept. 21, 1948.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Stanley Milledge, judge.

William J Pruitt, and William F. Brown, Jr., both of Miami, and Keen O'Kelley & Spitz, of Tallahassee, for appellant.

A. C Franks and H. H. Eyles, both of Miami, for appellee.

CHAPMAN, Justice.

Florence V. Jones on July 29, 1947, filed in the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County, Florida, her amended petition and alleged, in part, that she was unmarried and the mother of James Richard Jones, a child born out of wedlock, and that the father thereof was James A. York and it was his legal duty to support and maintain the child, which he failed neglected to do. The amended petition prayed (1) for the issuance of process; (2) that the court assume jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter; (3) that after a hearing the court determine the paternity of the child; (4) that the court determine that James A. York is the father of the child and that an appropriate order be entered requiring that he provide funds for its support and maintenance.

On the amended petition process issued out of said court and was served on James A. York, who appeared by counsel, and objected to the jurisdiction of the court over the parties and the subject matter for various constitutional reasons, and requested that the court enter an order dismissing the proceedings. The defendant's objections and motions were overruled and denied, and testimony was adduced and heard by the Honorable W. H. Beckham, Judge, in support of the allegations of the amended petition touching the paternity of James Richard Jones. Subsequently, on October 8, 1947, an order was entered by the court based on the allegations of the petition and testimony in support thereof, to the effect that James A. York was the actual and natural father of the illegitimate, and pertinent portions thereof are viz.: 'That the said James A. York, defendant, for the purpose of support of said child is the actual and natural father thereof and under a legal duty to provide a reasonable support for said child, James Richard Jones.' In the same order James A. York was required to pay the sum of $15 per week for the support and maintenance of said child, James Richard Jones, until the further order of the court.

Suggestion for a writ of prohibition was filed in the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in which it was represented that the Judge of the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of Dade County was without authority and power, under Chapter 19597, Acts of 1939, Laws of Florida, to receive the amended petition and issue process thereon or to compel James A. York to appear in said court and answer or defend the alleged charge; that the court was without jurisdiction to hear testimony based on the allegations of the petition and therefrom adjudicate and determine that James A. York was the actual and natural father of James Richard Jones or to make and enter an order requiring that from and after October 8, 1947, he pay each week into the registry of the court for the support of the illegitimate the sum of $15 until the further order of the court. The rule to show cause on the suggestion issued and Honorable W. H. Beckham, Judge, answered and filed a motion to quash on various grounds, which motion was granted and the petition dismissed. An appeal has been perfected here.

Counsel for appellant contend that the Legislature of Florida was without constitutional authority to enact the portions of Section 3 of Chapter 19597, supra, which authorized the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court to entertain the petitions, issue process, settle the pleadings, hear evidence and adjudicate the paternity of illegitimates in Dade County and by appropriate order provide for their support and maintenance as was done in the case at bar. Section 20 of Article 3 of the Florida Constitution prohibits the enactment of special and local laws in certain enumerated cases: 'Section 20: The Legislature shall not pass special or local laws in any of the following enumerated cases: that is to say, regulating the jurisdiction and duties of any class of officers, except municipal officers, or for the punishment of crime or misdemeanor; regulating the practice of courts of justice, except municipal courts; providing for changing venue of civil and criminal cases; granting devorces [divorces]; changing the names of persons; vacating roads; summoning and empannelling grand and petit juries, and providing for their compensation; for assessment, and collection of taxes for State and county purposes; for opening and conducting elections for State and county officers, and for designating the places of voting; for the sale of real estate belonging to minors, estates of descendents, and of persons laboring under legal disabilities; regulating the fees of officers of the State and county; giving effect to informal or invalid deeds or wills; legitimizing children; providing for the adoption of children; relieving minors from legal disabilities; and for the establishment of ferries.' (Emphasis supplied).

Pertinent portions of Section 3 of Chapter 19597, Acts of 1939, are viz.: 'Section 3.--Certain Juvenile Courts to be Hereafter Known as Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts; Jurisdiction Thereof.--That from and after the passage of this Act, those Juvenile Courts now established and existing, or hereafter

established and existing, either by special or general act, and presided over by a judge required to be admitted to practice law in this State, in any of those counties of this State which now have, or may hereafter have, a population of over 180,000, according to any preceding official census taken under the authority of the State of Florida, or of the United States Government, shall hereafter be known as the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court of the county in which located. In addition to the jurisdicition, power and authority now existing, or that shall hereafter be conferred thereon as Juvenile Courts, such courts shall hereafter have and possess the additional jurisdiction, power and authority to receive, investigate, hear and determine complaints, render judgment, and make lawful and reasonable orders for the enforcement thereof, involving any of the following: Concerning the violation of any Statutes of this State, now existing or hereafter enacted, for the protection of minors and involving any child under seventeen years of age, including violations of any statutes in which the gravamen of any such alleged violation, complaint or proceeding, is the failure or neglect of one member of a family to discharge any legal duty owed to another member of such family, directly and reasonably involving the moral or physical welfare of any child, and particularly laws relating to non-support, withholding support, school attendance, child labor, cruel treatment of children, offenses against the person and against decency and morality, when directly involving any child, or when contributing to the delinquency and dependency of any child; concerning investigations to determine the paternity of any child alleged to have been born out of wedlock for the purpose of providing support thereof, and to provide for the reasonable support of such child by any person found to be the parent thereof, or to provide for the care, support and disposition of such child as a dependent child, in case such child or either parent is residing within such county; * * * .' (Emphasis supplied.)

Sections 18, 19, 20 and 21 of Chapter 19597, supra, are viz.:

'Section 18. Partial Invalidity.--If any provision, section, phrase, paragraph or portion of this Act shall be found unconstitutional or invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall in no wise be construed as affecting the validity of the remaining portions of this Act.

'Section 19. Misdemeanor.--Any person wilfully violating any provision of this Act shall be subject to be prosecuted and punished as for a misdemeanor.

'Section 20. Contempt.--All powers for the punishment for contempt by Juvenile Courts in any such County shall exist and continue hereunder.

'Section 21. Repeal.--All other Acts, or parts of Acts, whether General or Special Acts, in conflict herewith, are hereby repealed, but it is not the intention of this Act to in any manner repeal or change any Special or General Act establishing any Juvenile Court in any of the Counties in the State affected hereby, except such portions thereof as may be in conflict with any provision hereof.'

It is admitted that Chapter 19597 supra established Juvenile and Domestic Relations Courts in Dade County and other counties of Florida having a population of 180,000 or more. These courts are given the jurisdiction and power to entertain complaints hear testimony and therefrom adjudicate or determine the paternity of illegitimate children born in Dade and other Counties, and make and enforce orders against the person found to be father for the support thereof. In the other Counties of Florida the paternity of illegitimates and provisions for their support are controlled and determined by the several provisions of Chapter 742, F.S.A. It is unnecessary to distinguish or point out the conflicts in the several provisions of the two Acts regulating bastardy. It is established law that the Legislature is without power to enact or pass Special or Local laws 'regulating the practice of courts of justice', but such laws shall be general and of uniform operation in the several counties of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • Florida Export Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Department of Revenue
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1987
    ...given to circuit courts over the same matters. See State ex rel. Jones v. Wiseheart, 245 So.2d 849 (Fla.1971); State ex rel. York v. Beckman, 160 Fla. 810, 36 In 1972 the Florida legislature implemented the amendments to article V respecting circuit court jurisdiction by providing in sectio......
  • Miller v. Davis, 33268
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 14, 1965
    ...take away any power from the criminal court of record vested in it by the Constitution.' To the same effect, see State ex rel. New York v. Beckham, 160 Fla. 810, 36 So.2d 769, relating to the powers of juvenile We denote nothing in present Art. V of the State Constitution as last revised wh......
  • State ex rel. Finch v. Bird
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • June 26, 1953
    ...Marshall v. Petteway, 121 Fla. 822, 164 So. 872; State ex rel. Garrett v. Whitehurst, 122 Fla. 484, 165 So. 691; State ex rel. York v. Beckham, 160 Fla. 810, 36 So.2d 769; State ex rel. Byer v. Willard, Fla., 54 So.2d 179; Feger v. Fish, 106 Fla. 564, 143 So. 605; Curtis v. Albritton, supra......
  • North Dade Bar Ass'n v. Dade-Commonwealth Title Ins. Co., DADE-COMMONWEALTH
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • June 26, 1962
    ...the exercise of a like power by other courts of this State. See State v. Sullivan, 95 Fla. 191, 116 So. 255, 259. State ex rel. York v. Beckham, 160 Fla. 810, 36 So.2d 769, 772. We therefore proceed to a discussion of the questions presented by this The appeal turns upon the question of whe......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT