State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Fuller, 57549
| Decision Date | 04 September 1979 |
| Docket Number | No. 57549,57549 |
| Citation | 258 S.E.2d 13,150 Ga.App. 387 |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
| Parties | STATE FARM FIRE & CASUALTY COMPANY v. FULLER. |
Greer, Klosik & Daugherty, John F. Daugherty, Michael L. Wetzel, Atlanta, for appellant.
Gus L. Wood, Newnan, for appellee.
This is an appeal from the dismissal of appellant's petition for declaratory judgment. State Farm insured a house belonging to Fuller. The house burned and the insured filed proof of loss. The insurer states it has good cause to believe it has a defense to the claim in that the insured intentionally burned the structure and then grossly inflated his claim for damages in order to defraud the company. State Farm is presently investigating under a nonwaiver of rights agreement, and no demand for payment has been made.
It is clear from the above that the insurer is not seeking to avoid "uncertainty and insecurity with respect to the propriety of some future act or conduct in order not to jeopardize (its) interest." Pendleton v. City of Atlanta, 236 Ga. 479, 224 S.E.2d 357 (1976). It is also fairly clear that the only thing the plaintiff is unsure of is whether its evidence is sufficient to convince a jury that its insured has committed fraud or arson, since the defense, if substantiated, is of course a complete answer to the problem. This is not the sort of "justiciable issue" with which the declaratory judgment law is involved; its purpose is not simply to second guess a jury. Reliance Ins. Co. v. Brooks Lumber Co., 101 Ga.App. 620, 115 S.E.2d 271 (1960). Where all rights have accrued, a petition by an insurer seeking merely to determine whether it is liable upon an insurance policy which it issued affords no sufficient basis for declaratory judgment, as the insurer's position may be presented at such time as suit is entered by the claimant. Provident Life & Acc. Ins. Co. v. United Family Life Ins. Co., 233 Ga. 540(2), 212 S.E.2d 326 (1975). In Provident such an action had already been filed. Here, no demand for payment has yet been made. These facts, however, go merely to the timing, and are not the gravamen of the action.
It was not error to dismiss the complaint on motion.
Judgment affirmed.
SHULMAN, J., not participating.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
American Family Mut. Ins. Co. v. Bowser
...768 P.2d 731 (Colo.App.1988); United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Dace, 305 N.W.2d 50 (S.D.1981); contra State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Fuller, 150 Ga.App. 387, 258 S.E.2d 13 (1979); Columbia Casualty Co. v. Zimmerman, Here, the declaratory judgment action was of a straightforward nature......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Shuman
...is not available to a party merely to test the viability of its defenses. Baron v. State Farm, supra; State Farm, etc., Co. v. Fuller, 150 Ga.App. 387, 258 S.E.2d 13 (1979); Shield Ins. Co. v. Hutchins, supra. Here, appellant's defense to appellee's claim is essentially a contest over the a......
-
Atlanta Nat'l League Baseball Club, Inc. v. Individually
...v. Majeed, 194 Ga.App. 276, 390 S.E.2d 269 (1990), aff'd., 260 Ga. 203, 391 S.E.2d 649 (1990); see also State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Fuller, 150 Ga.App. 387, 258 S.E.2d 13 (1979). Where a party seeking declaratory judgment does not show that it “is in a position of uncertainty as to an......
-
Allstate Ins. Co. v. Talbot
...It is clear that a viable declaratory judgment action was not initiated by appellant's petition (see State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Fuller, 150 Ga.App. 387, 258 S.E.2d 13 (1979)), and that appellant's petition did not serve to invoke the trial court's initial subject matter jurisdiction over......