State v. AM

Decision Date25 August 2000
Docket NumberNo. 2D99-3260.,2D99-3260.
Citation765 So.2d 927
PartiesSTATE of Florida, Appellant, v. A.M., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Susan D. Dunlevy, Assistant

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellant.

Karen S. Beavin of Sparkman & Quinn, Naples, for Appellee.

FULMER, Judge.

The State appeals from the trial court's order dismissing a delinquency petition that charged A.M. with exhibition of a weapon on school grounds. We reverse the dismissal and remand for further proceedings.

Section 790.115(1), Florida Statutes (1997), prohibits the exhibition of "any sword, sword cane, firearm, electric weapon or device, destructive device, or other weapon, including a razor blade, box cutter, or knife ... in a rude, careless, angry, or threatening manner" on school grounds. The allegation against A.M. in the delinquency petition tracked this statutory language. A.M. moved to dismiss pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.190(c)(4), asserting, among other things, that the weapon in question was a common pocketknife. After a hearing in which the trial court concluded that the weapon was a common pocketknife, and therefore excluded from the statutory definition of "weapon" pursuant to section 790.001(13), Florida Statutes (1997), the trial court granted the motion to dismiss, relying on L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370 (Fla.1997).

The State argues on appeal that the trial court erred in dismissing the petition because the statutory definition of weapon found in section 790.001(13) is not applicable in this case. It asserts that the reference to pocketknives found in that section, and discussed in L.B., no longer applies to exempt pocketknives from section 790.115(1) because the legislature amended section 790.115 effective October 1, 1997, to expand the definition of prohibited items, and to specifically prohibit any "knife" from being exhibited on school grounds.

We agree with the State that pursuant to the October 1997 amendment to section 790.115,1 any "knife," which we read to include even a "common pocketknife," is prohibited on school grounds. See A.B. v. State, 757 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); C.A.J. v. State, 732 So.2d 1228 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999) (Dauksch, J., concurring). Because this statute was in effect at the time of the offense, the trial court erred in granting the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, we reverse the order granting the motion to dismiss and remand to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Bunkley v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • November 21, 2002
    ...section 790.115, Florida Statutes, to specifically prohibit any "knife" from being exhibited on school grounds. See State v. A.M., 765 So.2d 927 (Fla.2d DCA 2000). This legislation does not alter the definition of weapon in section 790.001(13) or the incorporation of that definition into th......
  • McNeil v. State
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • April 13, 2017
    ...meaning which the [L]egislature intended to ascribe to the term.") superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. A.M. , 765 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). The word "a" is typically "used as a function word before most singular nouns" and is defined as "one," or "any, each." We......
  • State v. Darynani, 4D99-4172.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 27, 2000
    ...of clarity." L.B. v. State, 700 So.2d 370, 372, 373 (Fla.1997), superseded by statute on other grounds as stated in State v. A.M., 765 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000). "[A]ll doubts as to the validity of a statute are to be resolved in favor of constitutionality where reasonably possible." Dep......
  • JM v. State, 1D03-3468.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • May 10, 2004
    ...ERVIN and BOOTH, JJ., SMITH, LARRY G., Senior Judge, concur. 1.See A.B. v. State, 757 So.2d 1241 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); State v. A.M., 765 So.2d 927 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); and State v. Coleman, 802 So.2d 422 (Fla. 3d DCA 2. See Arroyo v. State, 564 So.2d 1153 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990); State v. Nixon,......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT