State v. Brown, 98-719

Decision Date25 September 1998
Docket NumberNo. 98-719,98-719
Citation717 So.2d 625
Parties23 Fla. L. Weekly D2206 STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Harold Lloyd BROWN, Jr., Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Maximillian J. Changus, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Stephanie H. Park, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The State appeals the downward departure sentence for offenses committed August 9, 1997. We reverse.

In departing, the trial court found two mitigating factors. First, the court indicated that it departed because Brown required specialized treatment for his addiction and was amenable to treatment. The legislature has eliminated this reason for departure for crimes occurring after July 1, 1997. § 921.0016(4)(d), Fla. Stat. (1997); Ch. 97-194, § 41, Laws of Fla.

Secondly, the trial court departed on the basis that the capacity of Brown to appreciate the criminal nature of his conduct or to conform that conduct to the requirements of the law was substantially impaired, drawing from the language in paragraph (4)(c) of section 921.0016, Florida Statutes (1997). Evidently, the trial court made the determination, as argued by defense counsel, that Brown was impaired due to his addiction to drugs. This basis was improper because "[a] defendant's substance abuse or addiction, including intoxication at the time of the offense ... does not, under any circumstances, justify a downward departure from the sentence recommended under the sentencing guidelines." § 921.0016(5), Fla. Stat. (1997).

Upon remand, a departure sentence may not be reimposed. Shull v. Dugger, 515 So.2d 748 (Fla.1987). A guidelines sentence must be imposed, or alternatively, Brown may withdraw his plea. State v. McGriff, 698 So.2d 331 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

GOSHORN, PETERSON and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • State v. Clay, 5D00-1357.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 2 Marzo 2001
    ...July 1, 1997. State v. Falocco, 730 So.2d 765 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999); State v. Norris, 724 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); State v. Brown, 717 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998) (citing section 921.0016(4)(d), Florida Statutes (1997); Chapter 97-194, section 41, Laws of Florida); see also State v. B......
  • State v. Gilson, 5D 01-767.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 7 Diciembre 2001
    ...552 (Fla. 5th DCA 1999). 4. § 921.0016(5), Fla. Stat. (1997); State v. Sanders, 728 So.2d 777 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999). 5. State v. Brown, 717 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). 6. Attention deficit is characterized by developmentally inappropriate inattention and impulsivity. The Merck Manual at 197......
  • State v. Beck
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 19 Julio 2000
    ...See also State v. O'Dorle, 738 So.2d 987 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Sanders, 728 So.2d 777 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); State v. Brown, 717 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). The third ground for departure was based on Beck's need for alcohol treatment. Under section 921.0016(4)(d), Florida Statutes, ......
  • State v. Ford, 98-2973.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 16 Junio 1999
    ...sentencing guidelines." § 921.0016(5), Fla. Stat. (1997). See also State v. Norris, 724 So.2d 630 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998); State v. Brown, 717 So.2d 625 (Fla. 5th DCA 1998). On remand, the trial court shall permit defendant to withdraw his plea, or sentence defendant within the sentencing Rever......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT