State v. Cowart

Decision Date22 June 2000
Docket NumberNo. SC95541,SC95541
Citation761 So.2d 1100
Parties(Fla. 2000) STATE OF FLORIDA, Petitioner, v. TYRONE COWART, Respondent
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Robert J. Krauss, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Wendy Buffington, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, Florida, for Petitioner

Judith Ellis, St. Petersburg, Florida, for Respondent

PER CURIAM.

We have for review the decision in State v. Cowart, 762 So.2d 527 (Fla. 2d DCA Apr. 28, 1999), which the court certified to be in conflict with the opinion in Woods v. State, 740 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999), and McKnight v. State, 727 So. 2d 314 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

We recently approved the First District's decision in Woods, holding that the Act, as properly interpreted by the First District, does not violate separation of powers, and rejecting other constitutional challenges to the Act. See State v. Cotton, SC94996 & SC95281 (Fla. June 15, 2000). Accordingly, for the reasons expressed in Cotton, we quash the Second District's decision in this case, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Because it appears that the respondent entered a plea of guilty based upon the trial court's indication that respondent, upon such plea, would not be sentenced pursuant to the Act, upon remand to the trial court, respondent shall have the right to withdraw his guilty plea.

It is so ordered.

HARDING, C.J., and SHAW, WELLS, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

QUINCE, J., dissents with an opinion.

QUINCE, J., dissenting.

I dissent for the reasons stated in my dissent in State v. Cotton, Nos. SC94996 & SC95281 (Fla. June 15, 2000)

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Motes v. State, 1D12–1097.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 31, 2013
    ...appeal; motion was, in fact, not dispositive and “appellant was entitled to rely on the court's statement”); see also State v. Cowart, 761 So.2d 1100, 1100–01 (Fla.2000) (reversing with instructions to permit defendant to withdraw his plea where trial court erroneously indicated defendant c......
  • Zambuto v. Palm Beach County, 4D99-1880.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 5, 2001
    ...that he cannot appeal entitles him to withdraw his plea. See Carlisle v. State, 687 So.2d 929 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997); see also State v. Cowart, 761 So.2d 1100 (Fla.2000) (supreme court held that the defendant would have the right to withdraw his guilty plea upon remand when his plea was based ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT