State v. Crews, 722.

Citation200 S.E. 378,214 N.C. 705
Decision Date04 January 1939
Docket NumberNo. 722.,722.
CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
PartiesSTATE. v. CREWS.

Appeal from Superior Court, Forsyth County; H. Hoyle Sink, Judge.

Hugh Carter Crews pleaded guilty of reckless driving and, from a judgment imposing sentence, he appeals.

Error, and case remanded.

Boyer & Julian, of Winston-Salem, for appellant.

Harry McMullan, Atty. Gen, and T. W. Bruton and Robert H. Wettach, Asst. Attys. Gen, for the State.

PER CURIAM.

The record reads: "The defendant comes into open Court and through his counsel waives the finding of the bill of indictment and enters a plea of guilty of reckless driving. Judgment of the Court is that the defendant be confined in the common jail of Forsyth County for a term of twelve (12) months and is assigned to work on the public roads of North Carolina under the supervision of the State Highway and Public Works Commission." To the judgment pronounced, the defendant reserved exception and appealed. The exception must be sustained. Section 60, Chapter 148, Public Acts 1927, N.C.Code of 1935 (Michie) § 2621 (102), reads: "Every person convicted of reckless driving under section three of this act [section 2621 (45)] shall be punished by imprisonment in the county or municipal jail for a period of not less than five days nor more than ninety days or by fine of not less than twenty-five dollars nor more than five hundred dollars or by both such fine and imprisonment * * *." The sentence of twelve months imprisonment exceeds the maximum limit of ninety days imprisonment fixed by the statute for conviction of reckless driving, of which offense the defendant plead guilty.

The case is remanded to the Superior Court of Forsyth County that the sentence passed upon the defendant may be set aside and punishment in accordance with the statute imposed. State v. Crowell, 116 N. C. 1052, 1053, 21 S.E. 502; State v. Smith, 174 N.C. 804, 93 S.E. 910; State v. Taylor, 124 N.C. 803, 32 S.E. 548, and cases there cited.

Error and remanded.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Tlx v. Morris, 753.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 4 Enero 1939
    ... ... As to the feme plaintiff, the daughter-in-law, we note the rule that in this State the fact of "family unity", of itself, is not sufficient to give rise to the presumption of ... ...
  • State v. Tyson
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 20 Octubre 1943
    ... ... N.C. 539, 106 S.E. 763; State v. Hill, 181 N.C. 558, ... 107 S.E. 140; State v. Williams, 186 N.C. 627, 120 ... S.E. 224; State v. Crews, 214 N.C. 705, 200 S.E ...           There ... is error in the judgment rendered below, and the case is ... remanded to Pitt County ... ...
  • State v. Tyson, 291.
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • 20 Octubre 1943
    ...181 N.C. 539, 106 S.E. 763; State v. Hill, 181 N.C. 558, 107 S.E. 140; State v. Williams, 186 N.C. 627, 120 S.E.. 224; State v. Crews, 214 N.C. 705, 200 S.E. 378. There is error in the judgment rendered below, and the case is remanded to Pitt County Superior Court, to the end that a proper ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT