State v. Henderson
| Decision Date | 02 May 2007 |
| Docket Number | No. 4D06-1706.,4D06-1706. |
| Citation | 955 So.2d 1193 |
| Parties | STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Matthew HENDERSON, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Bill McCollum, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Georgina Jimenez-Orosa, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Russell L. Cormican of Kent & Cormican, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
After the State of Florida charged him with trafficking in methamphetamine, Matthew Henderson sought dismissal of the charge on entrapment grounds. The trial court granted Henderson's motion and dismissed the charge, prompting this appeal by the State. We reverse.
There are two different theories of entrapment. "Objective entrapment analysis focuses on the conduct of law enforcement" and "operates as a bar to prosecution in those instances where the government's conduct `so offends decency or a sense of justice' that it amounts to a denial of due process." Davis v. State, 937 So.2d 300, 302 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (quoting State v. Blanco, 896 So.2d 900, 901 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005)). Subjective entrapment, on the other hand, "is applied in the absence of egregious law enforcement conduct and focuses on inducement of the accused based on an apparent lack of predisposition to commit the offense." Id. In this case, it is clear from the order of dismissal that the trial court relied upon subjective entrapment in dismissing the charges against Henderson.
The subjective entrapment theory has been codified at section 777.201, Florida Statutes (2006), and, under such theory, the first question that must be addressed is "whether an agent of the government induced the accused to commit the offense charged." Munoz v. State, 629 So.2d 90, 99 (Fla.1993). It is the defendant who bears the burden of proof with respect to this issue and who must establish inducement by a preponderance of the evidence. Id. It is only when this first question is answered in the affirmative that the remaining two questions must be addressed, i.e., "whether the accused was predisposed to commit the offense charged" and whether the matter of subjective entrapment should be put to the jury. Id.
The salient facts are summarized from the defendant's sworn motion to dismiss and the State's traverse. In February 2004, Ruben Jaramillo entered a plea of guilty to trafficking in cocaine and, as part of the plea, entered into a substantial assistance agreement with the State whereby he agreed to act as a confidential informant for the Sunrise Police Department. Jaramillo provided the police with a list of 75 to 100 names of potential "targets" he felt he could "pursue" for the sale of illegal narcotics. Jaramillo compiled this list by going through old cell phones and rolodexes, listing persons that he had either bought drugs from or sold drugs to in the past. The defendant's name was on that list. Jaramillo and the defendant worked together at a restaurant in the mid-1990s. Jaramillo stopped working at the restaurant in 1995 and occasionally sold drugs to the defendant during the time they worked together and "shortly thereafter." Jaramillo...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Woods v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...pleasbased on need, sympathy or friendship.'" Rivera v. State, 180 So. 3d 1195, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting State v. Henderson, 955 So. 2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). The arrest and booking report in Woods' criminal case reflects that Woods had requested to purchase a one-kilogram......
-
Lamb v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...pleas based on need, sympathy or friendship.'" Rivera v. State, 180 So. 3d 1195, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting State v. Henderson, 955 So. 2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). In the case at bar, the arrest and booking report reflects that Charles McMullen, a lieutenant assigned to the cy......
-
Thomas v. Sec'y, Fla. Dep't of Corr.
...pleas based on need, sympathy orfriendship.'" Rivera v. State, 180 So. 3d 1195, 1197 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (quoting State v. Henderson, 955 So. 2d 1193, 1195 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007)). The record reflects that two undercover officers, Detective Janes and Officer McCoy, set up a buy-bust operation i......
-
Green v. Sec'y, Dep't of Corr.
...agent to commit an offense, and who lacked predisposition to commit the offense. § 777.201, Fla. Stat.; State v. Henderson, 955 So.2d 1193, 1194-95 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).3 "Predisposition . . . focuses upon whether the defendant was an 'unwary innocent' or, instead, an 'unwary criminal' who r......
-
Pretrial motions and defenses
...had not contact for several years and caused him to sell drugs is not evidence of an inducement to commit a crime. State v. Henderson, 955 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) A CI approached defendant, who had no record, was unknown to law enforcement, and was employed in a lawful occupation. T......