State v. Hollomon, 49510

Decision Date09 July 1974
Docket NumberNo. 2,No. 49510,49510,2
Citation208 S.E.2d 167,132 Ga.App. 304
PartiesThe STATE v. J. C. HOLLOMON et al
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Joseph H. Briley, Dist. Atty., Gray, for appellant.

Byrd, Groover & Buford, Denmark Groover, Jr., Macon, Frank D. Farrar, Jr., Gray, for appellees.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court

STOLZ, Judge.

The defendants, members of the Jones County Board of Commissioners, were convicted of malpractice in office Code § 89-9907. The trial judge sentenced them to misdemeanor punishment and provided that they be 'hereby removed from office' as county commissioners. The defendants filed a motion for new trial and supersedeas was granted. The state then filed a 'motion for execution of sentence,' alleging that the provision of § 89-9907 for removal from office is not a portion of the punishment prescribed for a misdemeanor offense, hence was not stayed by the supersedeas, and praying that the judge order the defendants to vacate their offices as members of the board instanter and declare their posts vacant. Following a hearing, the trial judge overruled the state's motion, subject to the condition that, within 5 days, the defendants 'shall post a bond with good and sufficient security payable to Jones County, Georgia in the sum of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000) conditioned on their future faithful performance of their duties and the return of any sums received by them from Jones County in the form of salaries or other compensations or allowances which shall be determined to have been illegally received . . .' The State appeals from the overruling of its motion, which order was certified for immediate review. The appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Held:

Prior to 1973, there was no authority for appeals by the state in criminal cases. Code Ann. § 6-1001a (Ga.L.1973, pp. 297, 298) provides as follows: 'An appeal may be taken by and on behalf of the State of Georgia from the superior courts and such other courts from which a direct appeal is authorized to the Court of Appeals of Georgia and the Supreme Court of Georgia in criminal cases in the following instances: (a) From an order, decision or judgment setting aside or dismissing any indictment or information, or any count thereof. (b) From an order, decision or judgment arresting judgment of conviction upon legal grounds. (c) From an order, decision or judgment sustaining a plea or motion in bar, when the defendant has not been put in jeopardy. (d) In the case of motions made and ruled upon prior to the empanelling of a jury, from an order, decision or judgment sustaining a motion to suppress evidence illegally seized.' The order appealed from in the case sub judice is not one of the instances in which the state is granted the right of appeal in criminal cases under the provisions of § 6-1001a, supra.

Nor is the order made appealable by virtue of the certificate for immediate review. Code Ann. § 6-1002a (Ga.L.1973, pp. 297, 298) provides as follows: 'Other than from an order, decision or judgment sustaining a motion to suppress evidence illegally seized, in any appeal under the provisions of this Chapter where the order, decision or judgment is not final, it shall be necessary that the trial judge certify within 10 days of entry thereof that such order, decision or judgment is of such importance to the case that an immediate review should be had.' (Emphasis supplied.) Although it might be argued that § 6-1002a provides for certification of any non-final order, decision or judgment, without regard to those enumerated in § 6-1001a, supra, we do not find this to be the legislative intent. § 6-1002a...

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • State v. Martin
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • 27 September 2004
    ...See Glenn v. State, 271 Ga. 604(2), 523 S.E.2d 13 (1999); Berky v. State, 266 Ga. 28, 30, 463 S.E.2d 891 (1995); State v. Hollomon, 132 Ga.App. 304, 306, 208 S.E.2d 167 (1974). But see also State v. Strickman, 253 Ga. 287, 319 S.E.2d 864 (1984) ("Assuredly, the right of appeal provided to t......
  • State v. Stuckey
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 7 March 1978
    ...state to appeal in criminal cases is in derogation of prior law and must be strictly construed against the state. State v. Hollomon, 132 Ga.App. 304, 208 S.E.2d 167 (1974). However, desirable it may be to entertain an appeal in certain cases, if the state's appeal does not fit within one of......
  • Mingo v. State, 49794
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 31 October 1974
    ...authority to enact laws placing conditions upon appeals.' Fife v. Johnston, 225 Ga. 447, 169 S.E.2d 167. See also State v. Hollomon, 132 Ga.App. 304, 306, 208 S.E.2d 167. In Jordan v. Caldwell, 229 Ga. 343, 191 S.E.2d 530, our Supreme Court again construed Art. VI, Sec. II, Par. IV of the G......
  • State v. Warren
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • 30 January 1975
    ...to law. Prior to the passage of Code Ann. § 6-1001a, supra, the state had no right to appeal in a criminal case. In State v. Hollomon, 132 Ga.App. 304, 208 S.E.2d 167, this court held that § 6-1001a, being in derogation of pre-existing law, must be strictly construed against the state so as......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT