State v. Lundstedt, 48588
| Decision Date | 14 December 1954 |
| Docket Number | No. 48588,48588 |
| Citation | 67 N.W.2d 450,246 Iowa 355 |
| Parties | The STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Margaret LUNDSTEDT, Appellant. |
| Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Hall & McCarthy, Davenport, for appellant.
Leo A. Hoegh, Atty. Gen., Raphael R. R. Dvorak, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Charles G. Rehling, County Atty. of Scott County, Davenport, for appellee.
Defendant was convicted in police court of a misdemeanor. She appealed to district court and deposited $25 in money with the clerk of the district court in lieu of bail. Upon trial she was acquitted. One of the firm of attorneys who had represented defendant in said case subsequently asked the clerk to deliver to him the $25 deposit. The clerk refused, stating he would deliver it to defendant, only.
Thereafter, the attorney, in his own name, made application to the court for an order directing the clerk to issue a check for $25, representing the deposit, to the firm of attorneys. Upon trial to the court the application was dismissed. Thereafter, the court certified the cause to be one in which an appeal should be allowed and notice of appeal to this court was filed. This notice, captioned in the criminal case, recites, 'defendant herein has appealed * * * from the order * * * dismissing the Application of the Defendant * * *.' It was signed by the firm of attorneys, 'Attorneys for Defendant-Appellant.'
The appeal must be dismissed. Upon oral argument counsel candidly admitted the appeal was not taken by Margaret Lundstedt or with her consent or knowledge but was nothing more than an appeal by the firm of attorneys for their own purpose and benefit. They were not parties to the record and had no right of appeal. Garberson v. Garberson, 241 Iowa 713, 42 N.W.2d 391. It may be noted also, defendant herself would have had no right of appeal from the order, because it was not adverse to her.
Appeal dismissed.
All Justices concur.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Aumann, 59509
...259 Iowa 972, 982, 145 N.W.2d 631, 637 (1966), cert. denied, 386 U.S. 965, 87 S.Ct. 1046, 18 L.Ed.2d 115 (1967); State v. Lundstedt, 246 Iowa 355, 356, 67 N.W.2d 450 (1954); Garberson v. Garberson, 241 Iowa 713, 714, 42 N.W.2d 391 (1950); Tetzloff v. May, 186 Iowa 520, 524, 172 N.W. 446, 44......
-
State v. Schmidt
...who is not a party herein. This cannot be done. Garberson v. Garberson, 241 Iowa 713, 714, 42 N.W.2d 391, and citations; State v. Lundstedt, 246 Iowa 355, 67 N.W.2d 450. Defense counsel's contention is not properly before We find no reversible error. Upon the whole record, we feel defendant......
-
Motor Club of Iowa v. Department of Transp.
...circumstances would be required to dismiss the appeal. See State v. Schmidt, 259 Iowa 972, 145 N.W.2d 631 (1966); State v. Lundstedt, 246 Iowa 355, 67 N.W.2d 450 (1954); Garberson v. Garberson, 241 Iowa 713, 42 N.W.2d 391 (1950); 7 C.J.S. Attorney & Client § 95, pp. 912-914; 4 C.J.S. Appeal......
-
State v. Berry
...is not a party herein. This cannot be done. Garberson v. Garberson, 241 Iowa 713, 714, 42 N.W.2d 391, 392 and citations; State v. Lundstedt, 246 Iowa 355, 67 N.W.2d 450. Defense counsel's contention is not properly before us.' See, also, State v. Lundstedt, 246 Iowa 355, 67 N.W.2d 450 (1954......