State v. Shane
Decision Date | 29 June 1977 |
Docket Number | No. 59420,59420 |
Citation | 255 N.W.2d 324 |
Parties | STATE of Iowa, Appellee, v. Michael (NMN) SHANE a/k/a John Doe, Appellant. |
Court | Iowa Supreme Court |
Kjas T. Long, Waterloo, for appellant.
Richard C. Turner, Atty. Gen., David H. Correll, County Atty., for appellee.
Heard before MOORE, C. J., and RAWLINGS, LeGRAND, REYNOLDSON and McCORMICK, JJ.
On December 16, 1975, the Hollendale Grocery Store in Waterloo was robbed by two armed men. They obtained approximately $150 in cash, put the store manager and several customers in a walk-in cooler, and made good their escape. Defendant Michael Shane and his half brother, Raymond Smith, were apprehended the next day and charged with the crime of robbery with aggravation in violation of § 711.2, The Code, 1975.
We are here concerned only with Michael Shane's trial. He was convicted and sentenced to be imprisoned in the penitentiary as provided in § 711.2.
Defendant's appeal raises only one issue. He asserts several guns taken in a search of a motel room at the time of his arrest were illegally seized in violation of his 4th Amendment rights. He challenged this by a motion to suppress prior to trial. The motion was overruled, and the weapons were later used by the State in defendant's trial.
The Waterloo Police Department undertook an investigation of this robbery shortly after it occurred. They received information that one of the parties involved was Raymond Smith. They also ascertained that Raymond Smith was living in Cedar Rapids, Iowa, with a young lady by the name of Christy York. At that time the identity of Smith's accomplice was unknown.
Armed with an arrest warrant for Raymond Smith, several Waterloo detectives went to Cedar Rapids the day following the robbery. They were accompanied by Bud Welch, the manager of the Hollendale Grocery Store, who had been in charge of the store when the robbery occurred. In Cedar Rapids they enlisted the aid of several other detectives. They also obtained a search warrant to permit a search of the apartment allegedly occupied by Raymond Smith and Christy York.
Arriving at the York apartment, the police executed the search warrant. A search of the premises revealed several incriminating items, none of which is material to this inquiry. The arrest warrant was not served because Smith could not be found. However, the officers obtained information from Miss York that he was at a motel in Marion, Iowa.
The officers, again accompanied by Mr. Welch, descended on this motel. They determined which room Smith was occupying and then stationed themselves strategically where it could be kept under surveillance.
When the police first approached the motel, the room the suspects occupied was dimly lit. It seemed to be such light as might come from a television set. The officers noticed someone peering out the window. The lights were then extinguished. The police knocked on the motel room door, identified themselves, and demanded admittance. There was no answer. They repeated the procedure but again got no response. Meanwhile there was loud noise inside the room. There is some suggestion in the evidence that this was occasioned by the men attempting to escape. After a period estimated at three or four minutes, the door was opened a few inches. Several officers pushed their way in. At this time, the room was lighted.
There were two men in the room. One was Raymond Smith; the other Michael Shane. When the police first entered the room, Michael Shane was kneeling alongside one of the beds and seemed to be placing something underneath the mattress.
From here on, things happened quickly. Both men were handcuffed and placed under arrest. Mr. Welch immediately came into the room and identified both of the men as those who had robbed him the night before. A search of the room disclosed the presence of two guns underneath the mattress by the bed alongside which Shane had been kneeling. These are the items which defendant says were illegally seized.
Defendant relies on the 4th Amendment protection against unreasonable search and seizure. In considering a similar problem in State v. Jackson, 210 N.W.2d 537, 539 (Iowa 1973) we said:
Since the search in question was made without a warrant, it can be upheld, if at all, only on one of these recognized exceptions. We believe this search and seizure were incidental to a valid arrest.
This involves two questions. First, we must determine if there was a valid arrest. Second, assuming a valid arrest, we must determine if the search was incidental to the arrest and whether it was reasonable both as to the area covered and the time within which it was made.
We treat first the validity of the arrest.
When the officers went to the motel, they had an arrest warrant for Raymond Smith. They were in the process of making a legal arrest as far as Smith was concerned when they made their entry into the motel room.
The search and seizure objected to by defendant could be justified as incidental to Smith's arrest and would not depend on the validity of defendant's arrest at all.
We could summarily dispose of this appeal on that basis. Defendant is seeking the exclusion of evidence seized as a result of a search incident to Raymond Smith's arrest. Smith does not challenge the search. Defendant has no standing to do so. United States v. Bell, 457 F.2d 1231, 1239 (5th Cir. 1972); State v. Dixon, 241 N.W.2d 21, 23 (Iowa 1976); State v. Osborn, 200 N.W.2d 798, 805 (Iowa 1972).
However, that issue seems to have been ignored by both the State and the defendant. We have elected to consider the matter here as it was presented by the parties the validity of the seizure solely related to defendant's arrest and the subsequent search.
We hold there was no violation of defendant's 4th Amendment rights. A valid arrest may be made without a warrant when an officer has probable cause to believe a crime has been committed and that defendant committed it. Probable cause consists of circumstances which would lead a reasonable person to believe defendant committed the crime. State v. Evans, 193 N.W.2d 515, 517 (Iowa 1972); State v. King, 191 N.W.2d 650, 654 (Iowa 1971).
In Evans we quoted the following from Draper v. United States, 358 U.S. 307, 313, 79 S.Ct. 329, 3 L.Ed.2d 327, 332:
* * * "
This same test of probable cause for arrest without a warrant was approved in State v. Morris, 227 N.W.2d 150, 152 (Iowa 1975).
The officers had the following information when they arrested defendant. The Hollendale Grocery Store had been robbed by two armed men, one of whom was Raymond Smith. Miss York, with whom Smith and Shane both lived, told them the two men they wanted were at the motel in Marion, Iowa. On approaching the motel room, the officers noticed someone peering furtively out the window. The lights were then immediately extinguished. Repeated demands for entry were refused, even though the men identified themselves as officers and announced they had a warrant for Smith. There was loud noise from within the room, which the officers thought indicated an attempt to escape.
When the officers were finally admitted, d...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Foster v. State
...414 U.S. 1151, 94 S.Ct. 907, 39 L.Ed.2d 105 (1974); State v. Noles, 113 Ariz. 78, 81-82, 546 P.2d 814, 817-18 (1976); State v. Shane, 255 N.W.2d 324, 327-28 (Iowa 1977); State v. Cox, 294 Minn. 252, 257, 200 N.W.2d 305, 309 (1972); State v. Fitzpatrick, 32 N.Y.2d 499, 508, 300 N.E.2d 139, 1......
-
State v. Garcia
...exigent circumstances may relieve an officer from the obligation to obtain a warrant if it is impracticable to do so." State v. Shane, 255 N.W.2d 324, 326 (Iowa 1977) (quoting State v. Jackson, 210 N.W.2d 537, 539 (Iowa 1973)); see also Myer, 441 N.W.2d at The State has made no claims of an......
-
State v. Bumpus
...and that the arrestee committed or is committing it. See United States v. Bubis, 744 F.2d 61, 64 (8th Cir.1984); State v. Shane, 255 N.W.2d 324, 326 (Iowa 1977). In Green, the federal court faced circumstances nearly identical to those found in the case at bar. There, a police officer stati......
-
State v. Freeman, 63734
...probable cause should be resolved on probabilities based on practical considerations, not on legal technicalities. State v. Shane, 255 N.W.2d 324, 326 (Iowa 1977); State v. Morris, 227 N.W.2d 150, 152 (Iowa 1975); Evans, 193 N.W.2d at There is nothing in defendant's arrest and the subsequen......