State v. Superior Court In and For Ferry County
Decision Date | 22 November 1927 |
Docket Number | 20816. |
Citation | 145 Wash. 551,261 P. 90 |
Parties | STATE ex rel. PORTER v. SUPERIOR COURT IN AND FOR FERRY COUNTY et al. |
Court | Washington Supreme Court |
Department 1.
Original action by the State of Washington, on the relation of Samuel Porter, against the Superior Court in and for Ferry County C. H. Neal, Judge, to review a judgment of the superior court, affirming an order of the board of county commissioners declaring an emergency in the office of sheriff. Judgment affirmed.
Samuel Porter, of Republic, for relator.
John H Dunbar and E. W. Anderson, both of Olympia, amici curiae.
James T. Johnson, of Republic, for respondent.
This is an original action brought in this court to secure a review of a judgment entered by the superior court for Ferry county affirming an order of the board of county commissioners declaring that an emergency exists in the office of the sheriff of that county, and appropriating money to meet the emergency.
It appears that on July 5, 1927, the board of county commissioners, by unanimous vote, adopted a resolution as follows:
Gasoline, oil, repairs, and labor ...
$ 300 00
Tires .................................
125 00
Records and supplies ...................
Deputy hire ...........................
360 00
Board for county prisoners ............
200 00
---------
Total ..............................
Gas, oil, repairs, and labor ...
$300 00
Tires ...........................
125 00
Records and supplies .............
Deputy hire .....................
160 00
Board for county prisoners ......
100 00
--------
Total .........................
$700 00"
An appeal was taken to the superior court, in the manner provided by the statute. A hearing was had, evidence was received, and thereupon the superior court affirmed the order of the board of county commissioners.
The statute involved is section 2 of chapter 143, Laws of 1925, which, so far as is here in issue, reads as follows:
This statute seems to recognize two kinds of public emergencies. First, something other than the happening of events which are therein afterwards described; and, second, those...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
CLEAN v. City of Spokane
...Pennock, 27 Wash.2d at 743-44, 179 P.2d 961).25 Gray, 29 Wash.2d at 806, 189 P.2d 637.26 Id. (quoting State ex rel. Porter v. Superior Court, 145 Wash. 551, 559, 261 P. 90 (1927)).27 Gray, 29 Wash.2d at 808, 189 P.2d 637 (emphasis in original).28 State ex rel. Humiston v. Meyers, 61 Wash.2d......
-
Weisfield v. City of Seattle
... ... (MAXMILLIAN et al., Interveners. No. 25410. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc. January 4, 1935 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, King County; James B. Kinne, Judge ... wherein it was determined in State ex rel. Knez v ... Seattle, 176 Wash. 283, 28 P.2d ... ...
-
Love v. King County
... ... KING COUNTY et al. (BOOTH, Intervener. No. 25576.Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.April 11, 1935 ... Appeal ... from Superior Court, King County; Malcolm Douglas, Judge ... Action ... state adopted Initiative Measure No. 94, and the same became ... effective ... ...
-
Raynor v. King County
... ... KING COUNTY et al. No. 27792. Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc January 6, 1940 ... Action ... G. Raynor against King County, a Class A. County of the ... State of Washington, Ralph S. Stacy, as Treasurer of King ... County, and ... Appeal ... from [2 Wn.2d 202] Superior Court, King County; Clinton H ... Hartson, Judge pro tem ... purpose of operating the ferry Washington, at a time there ... was a strike. Desirable as it may ... ...