State v. Upkins
| Decision Date | 17 May 2017 |
| Docket Number | NO. 2016-1742,2016-1742 |
| Citation | 74 N.E.3d 464 (Table),149 Ohio St.3d 1405,2017 Ohio 2822 |
| Parties | State v. Upkins |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
149 Ohio St.3d 1405
74 N.E.3d 464 (Table)
2017 Ohio 2822
State
v.
Upkins
NO. 2016-1742
Supreme Court of Ohio
May 17, 2017
APPEALS ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Shelby App. No. 17–16–04. Discretionary appeal accepted on proposition of law No. IV. The parties are ordered to brief the issue stated as follows:
"When appellate counsel also served as trial counsel and moves to withdraw pursuant to Anders v. California , the court shall permit counsel to withdraw and must then appoint new appellate counsel to review the record and raise any nonfrivolous appealable issue."
O'Neill , J., would accept the cause on all propositions of law.
O'Donnell , Kennedy , and DeWine , J., dissent.
To continue reading
Request your trial
5 cases
- State v. Upkins
- Upkins v. Robinson
- Notice Violation v. LMD Integrated Logistic Servs., Inc. (In re LMD Integrated Logistic Servs., Inc.)
-
In re R.K.
...State v. Rogers , 143 Ohio St.3d 385, 2015-Ohio-2459, 38 N.E.3d 860, ¶ 20. A.S. appealed to this court, and we accepted jurisdiction. 149 Ohio St.3d 1405, 2017–Ohio–2822, 74 N.E.3d 464.Analysis {¶ 4} A.S. has raised a single proposition of law for this court's consideration. She asserts tha......
Request a trial to view additional results