Stewart v. Department of Corrections, 89-3129
| Decision Date | 09 May 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 89-3129,89-3129 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D1274 Lewis STEWART, Appellant, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and Public Employees Relations Commission (interested party), Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Robert L. Saylor of Saylor & Lerman, P.A., West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Lynne T. Winston, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dept. of Corrections, Tallahassee, for appellee--Dept. of Corrections.
We reverse. Where appellant's attorney filed a notice of appeal to the Public Employees Relations Commission one business day after the time limitation had run, the trial court erred in not applying the doctrine of equitable tolling and allowing appellant to pursue the appeal of his dismission of employment.
In Machules v. Dept. of Admin., 523 So.2d 1132 (Fla.1988), the supreme court held that equitable tolling focuses on the plaintiff's excusable ignorance of the limitations period and on the lack of prejudice to the defendant. It concluded that "equitable tolling, unlike estoppel, does not require active deception or employer misconduct, but focuses rather on the employee with a reasonably prudent regard for his rights."
In the instant case, appellant's attorney filed one day late, which neither party alleged caused the agency prejudice. Therefore, reasonably prudent regard for appellant's rights dictates that the doctrine of equitable tolling be applied, and that the appellant be allowed to pursue his appeal.
REVERSED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
O'Donnell's Corp. v. Ambroise
...560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Ret., 593 So.2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Stewart v. Department of Corr., 561 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Prohibition is inappropriate to review an order determining the time limitations under a statute of limitations. In P......
-
O'Donnell's Corporation v. Ambroise, Case No. 5D03-324 (Fla. App. 5th Dist. 11/7/2003)
...2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Ret., 593 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992); Stewart v. Department of Corr., 561 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990). Prohibition is inappropriate to review an order determining the time limitations under a statute of limitations.......
-
Environmental Resource Associates of Florida, Inc. v. State, Dept. of General Services
...filing in this case. I cannot discern any reason for not applying the rationale of the court's decision in Stewart v. Department of Corrections, 561 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), to the facts of this case. In applying the doctrine of equitable tolling to relieve the appellant from the loss ......
-
Vantage Healthcare Corp. v. Agency for Health Care Admin., 96-1437
...So.2d 1132 (Fla.1988)(emphasis added). Machules considered the denial of an appeal as untimely. Similarly, in Stewart v. Dep't of Corrections, 561 So.2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) the court invoked the doctrine of equitable tolling and reversed dismissal of a notice of appeal which was filed on......
-
Excuse me? The courts suggest the legislature amend APA provisions governing requests for hearing.
...4th D.C.A. 1988). (10) E.g., Machules v. Department of Admin., 523 So. 2d 1132 at 1134 (Fla. 1988); Stewart v. Department of Corrections, 561 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1990); Castillo v. Department of Admin., Div. of Retirement, 593 So. 2d 1116 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1992); Environmental Resource......
-
Equitable tolling in Florida administrative proceedings.
...day appeal period in this case.... "Id. at 1137. Post. Machules Equitable Tolling Decisions In Stewart v. Department of Corrections, 561 So. 2d 15 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990), the court reversed a Public Employees Relations Commission (PERC) order dismissing an employee's appeal of his termination ......