Stovall v. State, 7 Div. 158

Decision Date13 March 1952
Docket Number7 Div. 158
Citation57 So.2d 641,257 Ala. 116
PartiesSTOVALL v. STATE.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Merrill, Merrill & Vardaman, Anniston, for petitioner.

Si Garrett, Atty Gen., opposed.

LAWSON, Justice.

This is a petition by Jack Stovall for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Stovall v. State, 57 So.2d 641.

The petition is dismissed for failure to comply with the rule of this court requiring such petition to be presented on transcript paper. Supreme Court Rule 36, Code 1940, Title 7, Appendix; Bates v. General Steel Tank Co., Ala.Sup., 55 So.2d 218; Maddox v. City of Birmingham, 255 Ala. 440, 52 So.2d 166; Nix v. State, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 456; Barnett v. Pattillo, 251 Ala. 1, 36 So.2d 451; Anderson v. State, 251 Ala. 32, 36 So.2d 244; Farley v. State, 251 Ala. 391, 37 So.2d 440; Johns v. Thomas H. Vaughn & Co., 251 Ala. 489, 38 So.2d 21; Haney v. State, 250 Ala. 664, 36 So.2d 117; Allen v. State, 249 Ala. 201, 30 So.2d 483; Peterson v. State, 248 Ala. 179, 27 So.2d 30. See Ex parte Wood, 215 Ala. 280, 110 So. 409.

Petition dismissed.

FOSTER, SIMPSON, and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Purity Ice Co. v. Triplett
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Alabama
    • March 13, 1952
    ......257 Ala. 116. PURITY ICE CO., Inc. v. TRIPLETT. 6 Div. 232. Supreme Court of Alabama. March 13, 1952. ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT