Sweat v. State, 90-137
| Decision Date | 06 December 1990 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-137,90-137 |
| Citation | 570 So.2d 1111 |
| Parties | 15 Fla. L. Weekly D2944 Gregory Leon SWEAT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Michael S. Becker, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and David G. Mersch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.
This is an appeal from judgments and sentences entered in three circuit court cases. Appellant was convicted of six forgery-related felonies and sentenced as an habitual offender to a total of twenty years incarceration. Appellant first claims that his sentences were enhanced due to his cocaine addiction and therefore constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Appellant also argues that he did not receive written notice of the state's intention to seek sentencing under the habitual offender statute. Because we find merit in the latter argument, we reverse.
Appellant was classified as an habitual offender because of his criminal record, not because of his drug addiction. Appellant's total incarceration of twenty years for six felonies is not particularly harsh and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.
The record on appeal does not show that advance written notice of the state's intent to seek enhanced sentencing was served on appellant as required by law. See § 775.084(3)(b), Fla.Stat. (1989). This is reversible error, and appellant need not demonstrate that he was harmed by the lack of written notice. See Nunziata v. State, 561 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). Appellant's sentences are reversed, and the case remanded for resentencing.
JUDGMENTS AFFIRMED; SENTENCES VACATED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Massey v. State, 90-1043
...a submission on behalf of the defendant. (emphasis added). In Nunziata v. State, 561 So.2d 1330 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) and Sweat v. State, 570 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), we held that a defendant need not show harm in order to assert a lack of written notice as reversible error. However, t......
-
Miller v. State
...see Hale v. State, 630 So.2d 521 (Fla.1993), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 115 S.Ct. 278, 130 L.Ed.2d 195 (1994); Sweat v. State, 570 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Peek v. Wainwright, 393 So.2d 1175 (Fla. 3d DCA ...
-
Edwards v. State
...is irrelevant because lack of harm to the defendant is not the test used. Nunziata, 561 So.2d at 1331; see also Sweat v. State, 570 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990) (failure to serve advance written notice of state's intent to seek enhanced sentencing constitutes reversible error; defendant n......
-
Toliver v. State, 91-2796
...Sec. 893.13(1)(f), Fla.Stat. (1991).3 Sec. 775.084, Fla.Stat. (1991).4 Secs. 775.082(3)(c) and (d), Fla.Stat. (1991).5 Sweat v. State, 570 So.2d 1111 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990).6 Art. II, Sec. 3, Fla. Const.SECTION 3. Branches of Government.--The powers of the state government shall be divided int......