U.S. v. Colvin, 79-5198
| Decision Date | 17 March 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 79-5198,79-5198 |
| Citation | 614 F.2d 44 |
| Parties | 5 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1260 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Elouise COLVIN, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Robert E. Hedicke, El Paso, Tex. (Court-appointed), for defendant-appellant.
Le Roy Morgan Jahn, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for plaintiff-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas.
Before GOLDBERG, FRANK M. JOHNSON and HATCHETT, Circuit Judges.
Appellant, Elouise Colvin, seeks review of her conviction for the second degree murder of her infant daughter. Holding that evidence of other injuries was properly admitted, we affirm.
On October 4, 1977, Bobbie Shanae Colvin, defendant's fourteen month old daughter, was hospitalized with massive head injuries resulting in the child's death one week later. Testimony indicated that her death resulted from front and back head injuries sustained after September 4, 1977. On May 3, 1978, appellant made statements to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation at her home in Ft. Bliss, Texas, indicating that she had repeatedly struck her daughter's head against a tile floor approximately ten days prior to the child's death. Later that same day, similar statements were made to Army social workers at her home. At trial, the government introduced evidence of rib, clavical, and leg fractures necessitating the child's hospitalization on August 14, 1977.
The appellant claims that the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence of oral statements given to FBI agents and Department of Army employees; (2) failing to conduct a preliminary hearing to determine the admissibility of other injury evidence; and (3) admitting evidence of injuries occurring prior to September 4, 1977.
Having reviewed the record, we find appellant's oral statements to both the FBI agents and Army employees admissible under the guidelines of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966) and United States v. Mueller, 510 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1975).
Because this court may make an independent determination on the admissibility of extrinsic offense evidence on appeal, the district court's failure to conduct a preliminary hearing does not constitute reversible error. United States v. Black, 595 F.2d 1116 (5th Cir. 1979); United States v. Trevino, 565 F.2d 1317 (5th Cir. 1978).
We recently reversed a child abuse conviction where the government failed to show that the accused was responsible for prior injuries admitted into evidence. United States v. Brown, 608 F.2d 551 (5th Cir. 1979). Reversal was necessary because "proof demonstrating that the defendant committed the (prior) offense," is a "predicate to a determination that the extrinsic offense is relevant." United States v. Beechum, 582 F.2d 898, 912-13 (5th Cir. 1978) (en banc). In this case, there was sufficient evidence before the jury for it to reasonably conclude that the appellant was responsible for injuries occurring prior to September 4, 1977. By her own admission, she had exclusive control of the child at the time...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Norlin
...ER 404(b) only if it is connected to the defendant. See United States v. Boise, 916 F.2d 497, 502 (9th Cir.1990); United States v. Colvin, 614 F.2d 44, 45 (5th Cir.1980); United States v. Brown, 608 F.2d 551, 555, 57 A.L.R. Fed. 950 (5th Cir.1979) (evidence of prior injuries was not admissi......
-
Kolberg v. State
...that the defendant committed the prior offense." Id. at 760. One of the cases cited for this proposition is United States v. Colvin, 614 F.2d 44 (5th Cir.1980). In that case, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals said that such proof was a "predicate to the determination that the extrinsic evi......
-
U.S. v. Leight
...denied, --- U.S. ----, 106 S.Ct. 1977, 90 L.Ed.2d 661 (1986); United States v. Harris, 661 F.2d 138 (10th Cir.1981); United States v. Colvin, 614 F.2d 44 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 446 U.S. 945, 100 S.Ct. 2174, 64 L.Ed.2d 802 (1980); United States v. Woods, 484 F.2d 127; Vansickle v. Arkansa......
-
People v. Ward
...(2d ed.1979).) Courts have, under the exceptions, admitted evidence that an accused has abused children in the past. (United States v. Colvin (5th Cir.1980), 614 F.2d 44 (motive, pattern of abuse); People v. Platter (1980), 89 Ill.App.3d 803, 45 Ill.Dec. 48, 412 N.E.2d 181 (mental state); P......