Vidibor v. Adams
| Decision Date | 02 July 1987 |
| Docket Number | No. 86-1692,86-1692 |
| Citation | 509 So.2d 973,12 Fla. L. Weekly 1619 |
| Parties | 12 Fla. L. Weekly 1619 Sheldon VIDIBOR d/b/a Eastern Shores Mobile Village, Appellant, v. Tom ADAMS, et al., Appellees. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
James N. Charles and Charles D. Hood, Jr., of Cobb & Cole, Daytona Beach, for appellant.
Christopher W. Wickersham, Sr. and John S. Norton, Jr., of Becks, Becks & Wickersham, Daytona Beach, for appellees.
Vidibor appeals from an order denying him attorney's fees from the tenants of mobile home lots in Eastern Shores Mobile Village after they voluntarily dismissed their suit against him. The tenants, appellees herein, filed a suit for declaratory relief on January 1, 1985, which challenged the legality of rent increases imposed by Vidibor since 1980. In 1986, the court dismissed some of the tenants on the ground they failed to respond to discovery sought by Vidibor. After Vidibor filed a motion to tax costs, the rest of the tenants took a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice. We reverse.
Pursuant to section 723.068, Florida Statutes (1985), attorney's fees are specifically available to "the prevailing party":
Except as provided in s. 723.037, in any proceeding between private parties to enforce provisions of this chapter, the prevailing party is entitled to a reasonable attorney's fee.
Section 723.037(6) provides that upon proper request, a party shall not be entitled to attorney's fees if that party refuses to agree to mediate or arbitrate. But no contention is made in this case that anyone requested mediation or arbitration.
We think the language in section 723.068 is mandatory, and that if there is a "prevailing party," the court must award attorney's fees. 1 A party in the position of Vidibor "prevails" when plaintiffs who have brought suit under Chapter 723 voluntarily dismiss their suit against him, or are dismissed with prejudice. 2 We reject the view of our sister court in Simmons v. Schimmel, 476 So.2d 1342 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1985), review denied, 486 So.2d 597 (Fla.1986), that a party taking a voluntary dismissal can do so for strategic reasons and thereby prevent the other party from being determined to be the "prevailing party." However, we hasten to note there is nothing in this record to support appellees' contention that they dismissed for "strategic" reasons.
We therefore reverse the appealed order and remand for a determination and award of a reasonable attorney's fee pursuant to section 723.068.
REVERSED AND REMANDED.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Royal Palm Vill. Residents, Inc. v. Slider
...See, e.g., Mihevic Mgmt., Inc. v. Gardens Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. , 964 So. 2d 226, 227 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007) ; Vidibor v. Adams , 509 So. 2d 973, 974 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987). The key statutory phrase in § 723.068 is "to enforce." As directed by the Florida Supreme Court, see Advisory Opinion to Go......
-
Alhambra Homeowners Ass'n, Inc. v. Asad
...rule"); Lion Oil Co. v. Tamarac Lakes, Inc., 232 So.2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1970) (applying mechanic's lien statute); Vidibor v. Adams, 509 So.2d 973 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (involving section 723.068, Florida Statutes (1985)); Century Constr. Corp. v. Koss, 559 So.2d 611 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990) (invol......
-
Rose Printing Co., Inc. v. Wilson
... ... 4th DCA 1989). But see, Dam v. Heart of Florida Hosp., Inc., 536 So.2d 1177, 1178 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); and Vidibor v. Adams, 509 So.2d 973, 974 (Fla. 5th ... DCA 1987) (rejecting Simmons). Because the fee award in this case flows from the parties' agreement to ... ...
-
Simon Prop. Grp. v. Casino Travel, Inc.
...DCA has adopted the position that all voluntary dismissals (per se) confer prevailing-party status, see, e.g., Vidibor v. Adams, 509 So. 2d 973, 974 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987) (suggesting as much), this Court rejects that position. In applying Florida law, this Court's job is to predict (as best a......