Windermere, Ltd. v. Bettes, A93A0942
Decision Date | 01 December 1993 |
Docket Number | No. A93A0942,A93A0942 |
Citation | 438 S.E.2d 406,211 Ga.App. 177 |
Parties | WINDERMERE, LTD. et al. v. BETTES et al. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Irwin, Bladen, Baker & Russell, Kathleen M. Pacious, Jennie E. Rogers, Atlanta, for appellants.
Calabro & Jennette, Michael M. Calabro, Atlanta, for appellees.
After a fire destroyed their home in a residential apartment building owned and operated by appellant-defendants, appellee-plaintiffs brought the instant tort action to recover for personal injuries and property damage. The case was tried before a jury which found for appellees, awarding both compensatory and punitive damages, as well as litigation expenses and attorney fees. Appellants appeal from the judgment entered on the jury verdict.
1. Appellants moved for a directed verdict on the issue of punitive damages, arguing that there was no clear and convincing evidence to authorize such an award. The trial court denied the motion and the jury returned an award of punitive damages in the amount of $1. The denial of this motion for directed verdict and of a subsequent motion for j.n.o.v. are enumerated as error.
A directed verdict is proper only where there is "no conflict in the evidence as to any material issue and the evidence introduced, with all reasonable deductions therefrom, shall demand a particular verdict." OCGA § 9-11-50(a). Pursuant to OCGA § 51-12-5.1(b), punitive damages may be awarded "only in such tort actions in which it is proven by clear and convincing evidence that the defendant's actions showed willful misconduct, malice, fraud, wantonness, oppression, or that entire want of care which would raise the presumption of conscious indifference to consequences." Ponce de Leon Condos. v. DiGirolamo, 238 Ga. 188, 189(1), 232 S.E.2d 62 (1977). State Mut. Life etc. Assn. v. Baldwin, 116 Ga. 855, 860(3), 43 S.E. 262 (1903). (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Ivey v. Golden Key Realty, 200 Ga.App. 545(1), 408 S.E.2d 811 (1991).
Evidence was presented that faulty lighting was the cause of the blaze. In addition to suffering burns, appellees were injured when they had to jump from the second story of the apartment to flee the conflagration because interior hallway exits were already engulfed in flames. Appellees presented evidence that the apartment building failed to comply with safety features for isolating exits from fire as mandated by applicable building exit and fire codes. See generally OCGA § 25-2-4.
The landlord cannot avoid duties created by housing codes, building codes, or other regulatory provisions affecting the safety of the premises. Bastien v. Metro. Park Lake Assoc., L.P., 209 Ga.App. 881, 882, 434 S.E.2d 736 (1993). Although appellants vigorously contested the applicability of the fire and building exit codes and denied that the building was in violation of any provision thereunder, the evidence on these issues was in conflict. The rules and regulations of the Fire Safety Commissioner shall have the force and effect of law. OCGA § 25-2-4. OCGA § 1-3-6. The circumstances whereby the landlord failed to exercise any effort to comply with the mandatory safety provisions of an applicable fire or building exit code provided a clear and convincing evidentiary basis for an award of punitive damages against the landlord, for they demonstrate that entire want of care evincing conscious indifference to the consequences. See J.B. Hunt Transport v. Bentley, 207 Ga.App. 250, 256(3), 427 S.E.2d 499 (1992). See also Field Developers v. Johnson, 160 Ga.App. 180(2), 289 S.E.2d 321 (1981). The trial court correctly denied appellants' motions for directed verdict and j.n.o.v. as to the issue of punitive damages.
2. Appellees made a claim for the expenses of litigation pursuant to OCGA § 13-6-11, which provides: "The expenses of litigation generally shall not be allowed as a part of the damages; but where the ... defendant has acted in bad faith, has been stubbornly litigious, or has caused the plaintiff unnecessary trouble and expense, the jury may allow them." Appellants moved for a directed verdict as to these elements of damages, claiming that there was no evidence of bad faith and that the existence of a bona fide dispute as to liability precluded any award based upon stubborn litigiousness. The trial court denied this motion, and the jury awarded appellees $41,400 in attorney fees. The denial of this motion and of a subsequent motion for j.n.o.v. are enumerated as error.
Contrary to appellants' contention, the absence of an intentional tort is not fatal to appellees' claim for OCGA § 13-6-11 bad faith attorney fees. See Ford Motor Co. v. Stubblefield, 171 Ga.App. 331, 343(8b), 319 S.E.2d 470 (1984) ( ). Atlanta Journal Co. v. Doyal, 82 Ga.App. 321, 336(5), 60 S.E.2d 802 (1950). The cause of action in this case arises in part out of personal injuries appellees received when they were forced to leap from the second story of a burning building because the exits were not safe to use. Hinton v. Ga. Power Co., 126 Ga.App. 416, 420(9), 190 S.E.2d 811 (1972). Evidence that appellants failed to comply with mandatory safety regulations promulgated for the benefit of appellees is some evidence that appellants acted in bad faith in the transaction, within the meaning of OCGA § 13-6-11. Where, as here, evidence of bad faith in the transaction is presented, the existence of a bona fide ground for contesting liability is not dispositive of the claim for OCGA § 13-6-11 damages. Walther v. Multicraft Constr. Co., 205 Ga.App. 815, 816(2), 423 S.E.2d 725 (1992). The trial court correctly denied appellants' motions for directed verdict and j.n.o.v.
3. OCGA § 51-12-14(a) provides in part: "Where a claimant has given written notice ... of a demand for an amount of unliquidated damages in a tort action and the person against whom such claim is made fails to pay such amount within 30 days from the mailing of the notice, the claimant shall be entitled to receive interest on the amount demanded if, upon trial of the case ... the judgment is for an...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co. v. Ford
...contested the applicability of the reporting requirements, the evidence on that issue was in conflict. See Windermere v. Bettes, 211 Ga.App. 177(1), 178, 438 S.E.2d 406. " 'A product is not in a defective condition when it is safe for normal handling and consumption. If the injury results f......
-
Durkin v. Platz
...of litigation based on bad faith. See Fid. Nat'l Bank v. Kneller, 194 Ga.App. 55, 390 S.E.2d 55, 61 (1989); Windermere v. Bettes, 211 Ga.App. 177, 438 S.E.2d 406, 409 (1993). Therefore, despite the existence of a bona fide controversy, Plaintiffs may recover attorneys' fees by showing that ......
-
St. Paul Reinsurance Co., Ltd. v. Ross, No. A03A2304.
...of the [underlying] judgment shall bear interest except the principal which is due on the original debt." Windermere, Ltd. v. Bettes, 211 Ga.App. 177, 181(4), 438 S.E.2d 406 (1993), quoting OCGA § 9-12-10. "[I]nterest on interest" is prohibited. (Citation omitted.) Id. 11. Thus, the present......
-
In re Ellerbee, Bankruptcy No. 93-69789. Adv. No. 93-6541.
...tort. Bad faith relates to the conduct that gave rise to the litigation and is part of the claim itself. Windermere, Ltd. v. Bettes, 211 Ga. App. 177, 438 S.E.2d 406 (1993). An intentional tort carries with it an element of bad faith, and litigation expenses are typically recovered in such ......
-
Torts - Cynthia Trimboli Adams and Charles R. Adams, Iii
...Ga. at 489, 436 S.E.2d at 200 (Cloud Morgan, J. (sitting by designation), dissenting). 58. 209 Ga. App. 881, 434 S.E.2d 736 (1993). 59. 211 Ga. App. 177, 438 S.E.2d 406 (1993). 60. 209 Ga. App. 696, 434 S.E.2d 740 (1993). 61. Id. at 698, 434 S.E.2d at 742. Compare Yancey with Collins v. She......