State v. McLamb
| Decision Date | 11 June 2008 |
| Docket Number | No. 489P07.,489P07. |
| Citation | 362 N.C. 368,663 S.E.2d 433 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | STATE of North Carolina v. William Roger McLAMB. |
Upon consideration of the petition filed by State of NC on the 5th day of October 2007 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 5th day of' October 2007 by State of NC in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 11th day of June 2008."
To continue reading
Request your trial
- Townsend v. Stancil
-
State v. Pendergraft
...of an indictment using a de novo standard of review. State v. Marshall, 188 N.C.App. 744, 748, 656 S.E.2d 709, 712, disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 368, 661 S.E.2d 890 (2008). "Under a de novo review, the court considers the matter anew and freely substitutes its own judgment for that of the ......
-
State v. Heien
...number of brake lights required by section 20–129. Id. at ––––, 714 S.E.2d at 831. Then, relying on its decision in State v. McLamb, 186 N.C.App. 124, 649 S.E.2d 902 (2007), disc. rev. denied,362 N.C. 368, 663 S.E.2d 433 (2008), the Court of Appeals held that the traffic stop was unconstitu......
-
In re J.M.
...petition using a de novo standard of review. State v. Marshall, 188 N.C. App. 744, 748, 656 S.E.2d 709, 712 (2007), disc. review denied, 362 N.C. 368, 661 S.E.2d 890 (2008). N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-924(a) provides, in pertinent part, that:Page 6A criminal pleading must contain . . . [a] plain......