Alvarez v. State, 83-2590
Decision Date | 16 April 1985 |
Docket Number | No. 83-2590,83-2590 |
Citation | 467 So.2d 455,10 Fla. L. Weekly 986 |
Parties | 10 Fla. L. Weekly 986 Florencio ALVAREZ, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Martin Lemlich, Miami Beach, John H. Lipinski, Miami, for appellant.
Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., and Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
Before HENDRY, BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
controls the present case.
The defendant was convicted of first-degree murder and was sentenced to life imprisonment with the mandatory proviso that he serve no less than twenty-five years before becoming eligible for parole. His conviction rested entirely on the testimony of Jose Chavez-Rodriguez, a supposed accomplice to the shooting, and Rolando Garcia, a supposed accessory after the fact. No other witness or physical evidence linked the defendant to the crime.
Under these circumstances, it was harmful error for the trial court to sustain the State's objections to cross-examination of Chavez designed to elicit that Chavez had served less than eight months of a thirty-two month sentence by virtue of an agreement with the State to recommend an "early parole" in return for "telling the truth." 1 , 2 See Watts v. State, 450 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984) ( ); Cruz v. State, 437 So.2d 692 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) ( ); Holt v. State, 378 So.2d 106 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980) ( ). See also Daniels v. State, 374 So.2d 1166 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979).
In addition, we find error in the trial court's preclusion of cross-examination of both Chavez and Garcia intended to elicit that each had been convicted of felonies in Cuba prior to coming to the United States. Concededly, it has been said that questions regarding past convictions should not be asked unless the questioner has "knowledge that the witness has been convicted of a crime and has the evidence necessary for impeachment if the witness fails to admit the number of convictions of such crimes." Cummings v. State, 412 So.2d 436, 439 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). See Parks v. Zitnik, 453 So.2d 434 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984); King v. State, 431 So.2d 272 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Blasco v. State, 419 So.2d 807 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982). The requirement that the attorney have the evidence necessary for impeachment merely assures that he will not ask questions which suggest a certain set of facts in the absence of a good faith belief that those facts are true. See Smith v. State, 414 So.2d 7 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); Dukes v. State, 356 So.2d 873 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Thorpe v. State, 350 So.2d 552 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977). Clearly, "it would be highly improper if [an attorney], upon receiving a negative answer to questions about past convictions, could read from an ostensibly official paper and ask defendant if he had been convicted of various and sundry crimes (which defendant might deny), while never entering an actual certified record of the defendant's former conviction into evidence." Irvin v. State, 324 So.2d 684, 686 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 334 So.2d 608 (Fla.1976). Enforcement of this "good faith" requirement by mandating that the record of prior convictions stand ready to come into evidence should, however, have no...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Peoples v. State
...copies of federal convictions because they may be difficult to obtain. We recognize the exceptional circumstances in Alvarez v. State, 467 So.2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), rev. denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985), where it was held that evidence of a felony conviction in Cuba should have been adm......
-
Delgado-Santos v. State
...its mandatory twenty-five years without parole--until after Ortiz testified "truthfully" in the Santos case. See Alvarez v. State, 467 So.2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). The use of this common, effective, and surely not impermissible prosecutorial technique might well have obviated the severe le......
-
Riechmann v. State, 73492
...90.610(1), provided the accused has not shown evidence of a lack of fairness in the foreign justice system. 15 See Alvarez v. State, 467 So.2d 455, 456 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985); accord United States v. Manafzadeh, 92 F.2d 81, 90 (2d Cir.1979); United States v. ......
-
Livingston v. State, 68323
...been, for instance, the sole witness or if the evidence had been less concrete. This case is a far cry from cases such as Alvarez v. State, 467 So.2d 455 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 476 So.2d 675 (Fla.1985); Kelly v. State, 425 So.2d 81 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), review denied, 434 So.2d 889 (Fl......