Brady v. Hyman
Citation | 230 S.W.2d 342 |
Decision Date | 10 May 1950 |
Docket Number | No. 12090,12090 |
Parties | BRADY et al. v. HYMAN. |
Court | Court of Appeals of Texas. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas |
William E. Remy, San Antonio, for appellants.
David A. Grose, Alice, for appellee.
On November 25, 1949, the Hon. Raeburn Norris, sitting as special judge of the District Court of Jim Wells County, Texas, ordered a prior decree of said court, dated February 27, 1946, modified so as to reduce the child support payments provided for in the original decree, from $150 per month to $50 per month. This action was taken upon motion of Vance Hyman, the father of the minor, Blanche Kay Hyman. Kathryn Brady, the mother of the child and former wife of Vance Hyman, has appealed.
By the 1946 decree, Mrs. Brady, then Mrs. Hyman, was granted a divorce from Vance Hyman and the custody of the minor was awarded to her, subject to the father's right to keep the child during the months of June, July and August, should he have a suitable place for the child to stay.
Mrs. Brady here contends that the child support provisions of the decree were based upon a contract, and that the court erred in attempting to modify or change these contractual provisions. She also contends that the action of the court in reducing the award is not supported by the evidence.
In two recent cases, Plumly v. Plumly, Tex.Civ.App., 210 S.W.2d 177, and Mobley v. Mobley, Tex.Civ.App., 221 S.W.2d 565, this Court set forth the rules applicable to a decree of this kind which is in the nature of a contract and also posesses certain qualities of a judgment. Such a decree, insofar as it is based upon Article 4639a, Vernon's Ann.Civ.St., and is enforcible by contempt proceedings, may properly be modified by a subsequent decree of the court. Ex parte Birkhead, 127 Tex. 556, 95 S.W.2d 953; Townsend v. Townsend, Tex.Civ.App., 115 S.W.2d 769. However, an agreement to pay a certain sum of money per month for the support of a child is enforcible as a contract and entitled to the ordinary processes of laws provided for the enforcement of contractual obligations. The fact that the agreement is recorded as part of a judicial decree does not change the rule. Snipes v. Snipes, Tex.Civ.App., 174 S.W.2d 741.
A contract was the basis of the property settlement and the child support provisions contained in the 1946 divorce decree. The trial court accepted appellee's contention that this agreement simply provided that the trial court could provide for the payment of $150 per month for child support, and that such amount could be changed from time to time as the court saw fit. The contention of appellant, on the other hand, was that the agreement to pay $150 per month for child support was an absolute contractual obligation adopted as a part of a property settlement agreement, and hence enforcible as a contract.
In view of these conflicting contentions, it is necessary to examine the contract and decree in some detail. The written agreement of the parties consists of a preamble and eight numbered paragraphs. It is recited in the preamble that: 'Whereas, certain disputes and unhappy differences have arisen between First Party (Vance Hyman) and Second Party (Kathryn Hyman), for which reasons said parties have consented and agreed to live separately and apart from each other and are desirous of dividing and partitioning the community property of the parties hereto and therefore enter into the following agreement in connection therewith:'
The contract then provides for the division of various properties owned by the parties. Paragraph 'V' relates to child support and provides that:
'It...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hafner v. Hafner
...recognized.5 For holding that such are consent decrees, see, e.g., Dean v. Dean, 136 Or. 694, 300 P. 1027, 86 A.L.R. 79; Brady v. Hyman, Tex.Civ.App., 230 S.W.2d 342; Barnes v. American Fertilizer Co., 144 Va. 692, 130 S.E. 902.6 Keach v. Keach, 217 Ky. 723, 290 S.W. 708; Karnes v. Black, 1......
-
Ward v. Commissioner
...of the parties is governed by the laws relating to contracts. Plumly v. Plumly, 210 S.W. 2d 177 (Tex. Ct. App. 1948); Brady v. Hyman, 230 S.W. 2d 342 (Tex. Ct. App. 1950); Lee v. Lee, 509 S.W. 2d 922 (Tex. Ct. App. 1974). In the present case the duty to make payments specifically for the su......
-
Peddicord v. Peddicord, 7684
...1948, writ dism.) (cited with approval in Ex parte Jones, 163 Tex. 513, 358 S.W.2d 370, 375 (1962), upon another point); Brady v. Hyman, 230 S.W.2d 342, 344 (Tex.Civ.App.--San Antonio 1950, no writ); Routon v. Phillips, 246 S.W.2d 223, 225 (Tex.Civ.App.--Fort Worth 1952, writ ref'd n.r.e.);......
-
Klaeveman v. Klaeveman, 10456
...that should be binding on either party, regardless of furture conditions and circumstances.' Appellant relies principally upon Brady v. Hyman, 230 S.W.2d 342, 344, and Hyman v. Brady, 230 S.W.2d 345, by the San Antonio Court of Civil Appeals, no writ In that case there was an agreement made......