Cobb County v. Campbell, 43995
Decision Date | 04 December 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 43995,43995 |
Parties | COBB COUNTY v. CAMPBELL et al. |
Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
Irma B. Glover, Sams, Glover & Gentry, Marietta, for Cobb County.
Mike Treadaway, Marietta, G. Conley Ingram, Walter G. Elliott, Atlanta, for Nancy Maddox Campbell et al.
Cobb County brought this action for declaratory judgment challenging the constitutionality of Ga.L.1984, p. 4256, which Act created two additional judgeships (designated "Associate Judges") for the State Court of Cobb County. It was stipulated that two Magistrates (predecessors to Associate Judges) of the State Court of Cobb County were in office under four-year terms on the July 1, 1984, effective date of the 1984 Act in question; that both of those positions, the terms of which will expire on December 31, 1986, are presently vacant; that defendants-appellees Nancy Maddox Campbell and Russell Carlisle were elected in the 1986 general election to four-year terms as Associate Judges of the State Court of Cobb County, to commence on January 1, 1987; and that the salaries and expenses of the State Court of Cobb County are paid out of the county treasury. The county appeals from a judgment upholding the constitutionality of the 1984 Act. We affirm.
Fulton County v. Woodside, 222 Ga. 90, 96 (2), 149 S.E.2d 140 (1966).
The appellant county contends that the 1984 Act is in violation of the uniformity provisions of the 1983 Georgia Constitution, i.e., Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. V: "Except as otherwise provided in this Constitution, the courts of each class shall have uniform jurisdiction, powers, rules of practice and procedure, and selection, qualifications, terms, and discipline of judges ..."; and Art. VI, Sec. IX, Par. I: It is argued that "[i]t is evident from the Act as a whole that the legislature never intended to create two full-fledged state court judges, but intended to vary the practice in Cobb County from other state courts across the state by providing a two-tier, hybrid court, composed of state court judges and associate state court judges with a non-uniform method of case assignment and handling of the court's business."
Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. V of the 1983 Constitution requires certain uniformity among "courts." The term "court" refers to the entire court, and not to the judge or judges of the court. Fulton County v. Woodside, 222 Ga. 90, supra, pp. 97, 101, 149 S.E.2d 140. By way of contrast, Art. VI, Sec. IX, Par. I of both the 1945 and 1976 Constitutions had a requirement for uniformity of "officers invested with judicial powers" as well as of courts, which requirement was deleted in the 1983 Constitution. Moreover, Art. VI, Sec. I, Par. VII of the Constitution of 1983 provides: "The General Assembly may abolish, create, consolidate, or modify judicial circuits and courts and judgeships ..." (Emphases supplied.) Thus, there is no...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Service Employees Intern. Union v. Perdue
...conflicting with that meaning amounts to a "clear and palpable conflict" with the Merit System Provision. See Cobb County v. Campbell, 256 Ga. 519, 350 S.E.2d 466 (1986) (legislation will be upheld as constitutional unless conflict with Constitution is clear and palpable). Finally, the Stat......
-
Lumpkin v. Johnson, S98A1444.
...number of cases, is subject to the approval or modification of a majority of the judges in the circuit. [Cit.]" Cobb County v. Campbell, 256 Ga. 519, 520, 350 S.E.2d 466 (1986). Here, a majority of the judges has elected to adopt such a different system, whereby the Chief Judge, rather than......
-
Cuzzort v. State, S99A1120.
...to the approval of a majority of the circuit's judges. Lumpkin v. Johnson, 270 Ga. 392(1), 509 S.E.2d 621 (1998); Cobb County v. Campbell, 256 Ga. 519, 350 S.E.2d 466 (1986) (applying Rule 3.1 of the Uniform State Court Rules). Certainly, "judges, in their capacity as members of the judicia......
- Spears v. Johnson