Com. v. Oliver

Decision Date13 February 1961
Citation342 Mass. 82,172 N.E.2d 241
PartiesCOMMONWEALTH v. Carroll A. OLIVER (four cases). COMMONWEALTH v. Michael J. WELCH (four cases). COMMONWEALTH v. Milton E. KELLEY (three cases). COMMONWEALTH v. John J. O'DONNELL (five cases).
CourtUnited States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court

Joseph T. Doyle, Asst. Atty. Gen., James W. Bailey, Sp. Atty. Gen., for the Commonwealth.

Michael J. Monahan and Joseph M. McDonough, Boston, for defendants.

Before WILKINS, C. J., and SPALDING, WHITTEMORE, CUTTER and KIRK, JJ.

WHITTEMORE, Justice.

This is a report by a judge of the Superior Court of the questions of law arising on motions of three members of the Municipal Light Commission of Taunton, and the manager of the Municipal Lighting Plant, to quash indictments which charge violations of G.L. c. 266, § 51, c. 268, § 9, and c. 149, §§ 44A-44L.

1. Each of the defendants is an officer of the city of Taunton under G.L. c. 266, § 51, which provides that 'A county, city or town officer who embezzles or fraudulently converts, or who fraudulently takes or secretes with intent so to do, effects or property which belong to or are in possession of said county, city or town, shall be punished * * *.'

The affairs of the political subdivisions of the Commonwealth are by statute entrusted for the most part to public officers who are not agents or servants of the municipality, county or other political entity for which they act but are nevertheless appropriately designated as officers of such entities. Commonwealth v. Dowe, 315 Mass. 217, 222-224, 52 N.E.2d 406. Municipal Light Commission of City of Taunton v. City of Taunton, 323 Mass. 79, 84, 80 N.E.2d 31, 34, holding that the Taunton municipal light commissioners, appointed by the mayor under Spec.St.1919, c. 150, are not agents of the city subject to its direction and control but rather 'public officers under legislative mandate,' in no way suggests that the commissioners are not officers of the city. On the contrary, read with the Dowe case, supra, it puts them in that category, along with the mayor, assessors, other officers, and the members of various municipal boards whose status is reviewed in the Dowe case. See G.L. c. 164, § 63, discussed below. The commissioners are no less city officers because, as the Taunton case notes (323 Mass. at page 84, 80 N.E.2d at page 34), they are 'subject to the supervision of other public officers and particularly of the department of public utilities.' They are 'not in any ordinary sense * * * [officers] of the Commonwealth.' Commonwealth v. Dowe, supra, 315 Mass. at page 224, 52 N.E.2d at page 411.

The defendant Oliver, as manager of the plant, although he acts under the direction and control of commissioners (Spec.St.1919, c. 150, §§ 1, 2; G.L. c. 164, § 56; Capron v. City of Taunton, 196 Mass. 41, 43, 81 N.E. 873; Municipal Light Commission of City of Taunton v. City of Taunton, 323 Mass. 79, 83-84, 80 N.E.2d 31) is nevertheless a public officer of the city. Attorney General v. Tillinghast, 203 Mass. 539, 543-544, 89 N.E. 1058. Commonwealth v. Dowe, 315 Mass. 217, 222, 52 N.E.2d 406. The Dowe case holds that the commissioner of soldiers' relief of Lawrence, although subordinate in some respects to a higher State officer and to the mayor and city council, was a public officer indictable for bribery under G.L. c. 268, § 8, as a municipal officer. The manager has important duties prescribed by statute and when the office was first authorized he was expressly called an 'officer * * * known as manager.' St.1891, c. 370, § 8. Express designation is also found in G.L. c. 164, § 63, which requires an annual return by the manager and by municipal light board members and provides that 'Any officer of a town' thus required to make an annual return who neglects so to do shall be subject to a penalty.

2. The defendant Oliver as manager of the plant is, within the meaning of G.L. c. 268, § 9, '[a]n officer * * * of * * * a * * * city * * * [who is] authorized to procure materials, supplies or other articles either by purchase or contract,' and he is therefore subject to indictment thereunder if he 'receives * * * [a] present * * * from the person who makes such contract, [or] furnishes such materials, supplies or other articles.' Point 1, supra. G.L. c. 164, § 56. Spec.St.1919, c. 150. Capron v. City of Taunton, 196 Mass. 41, 81 N.E. 873. The manager, 'under the direction and control of the * * * [commissioners] and subject to * * * [c. 164, has] full charge of the operation and management of the plant, the manufacture and distribution of gas or electricity, the purchase of supplies, the employment of attorneys and of agents and servants, the method, time, price, quantity and quality of the supply, the collection of bills, and the keeping of accounts.'

The indictments of the commissioners for violation of G.L. c. 268, § 9, in the taking of presents from suppliers are also valid.

Special St.1919, c. 150, § 1, gives the commissioners the powers and duties formerly in the mayor and 'in addition all the powers and duties now conferred or imposed by law upon municipal light boards in towns.' Such boards have always had authority inter alia to 'maintain and operate' the plant and the manager has been subordinate to them. St.1893, c. 454, § 10. R.L. c. 34, § 19. G.L. c. 164, § 55. See Capron v. City of Taunton, 196 Mass. 41, 43, 81 N.E. 873, 874. The manager by § 56 acts 'under the direction and control of the mayor, selectmen or municipal light board, if any, and subject to this chapter * * *.' Thus it appears that the management and operation of the plant is in the board (or commissioners under Spec.St.1919, c. 150) by virtue of G.L. c. 164, § 55, and in the manager acting under them as their executive officer by virtue of § 56. See Whiting v. Mayor v. Holyoke, 272 Mass. 116, 119-120, 172 N.E. 338; Municipal Light Commission of City of Taunton v. Taunton, 323 Mass. 79, 80 N.E.2d 31. The breadth of the specification of the duties of the manager, that he is to have 'full charge of the operation and management of the plant * * * the purchase of supplies * * * [etc.]' (emphasis supplied), is modified by § 55.

The authority under G.L. c. 164, § 55, to 'operate' a plant includes authority to buy needed supplies and equipment. The superior authority of the commissioners includes at least the authority to approve or disapprove contracts and purchase orders for supplies and equipment negotiated in the first instance by the manager. It also includes by reasonable implication power to initiate purchases if for any reason a manager should not be acting. The commissioners' authority therefore is authority, the exercise of which can be corrupted by a bribe; it is authority within the meaning of G.L. c. 268, § 9, construed according to the rule for strict, but common sense and effective construction applicable to criminal statutes. See Libby v. New York, N. H. & H. R. R., 273 Mass. 522, 526, 174 N.E. 171, 73 A.L.R. 101; Commonwealth v. Corbett, 307 Mass. 7, 8, 29 N.E.2d 151; Commonwealth v. Slome, 321 Mass. 713, 716, 75 N.E.2d 517.

Capron v. City of Taunton, 196 Mass. 41, 81 N.E. 873, 874, is distinguished by the difference in the statutes. The case holds that the mayor under R.L. c. 34, § 20 (now G.L. c. 164, § 56), had no authority to require the remployment of an employee discharged by the manager; that the manager, being under the direction and control of the appointing authority (in that case the mayor), was, in the exercise of his powers, subject to such reasonably required general regulations as the appointing authority might make; but that 'original authority to contract in behalf of the city for the hiring of all employes, or to discharge them, was delegated only to the manager.' The mayor did not have the express authority given by R.L. c. 34, § 19 (now G.L. c. 164, § 55), to the municipal light board, and, by the presently applicable statutes, to the defendant commissioners, to 'maintain and operate' the plant. We intend no intimation as to whether G.L. c. 268, § 9, may be applicable to mayors or selectmen acting under G.L. c. 164, § 56, in 'direction and control' of managers with or without formal supervisory regulations or instructions. As to the meaning of such words as 'direction and control' in particular contexts see also Rockhill Iron & Coal Co. v. City of Taunton, 1 Cir., 273 F. 96, 101; Berkshire Woollen Co. v. Day, 12 Cush. 128, 130; Hobart v. Commissioner of Corps. & Taxn., 311 Mass. 341, 344-345, 41 N.E.2d 38; Warner Valley Stock Co. v. Smith, 165 U.S. 28, 33-34, 17 S.Ct. 225, 41 L.Ed. 621; Greene v. Wheeler, 7 Cir., 29 F.2d 468, 469; Amsel v. Brooks, 141 Conn. 288, 296-297, 106 A.2d 152, 45 A.L.R.2d 1234; In re Durant, 60 Vt. 176, 180-182, 12 A. 650.

3. The indictments are invalid which charge the awarding of a contract 'for the alteration, remodeling and repair of a public building in the amount of $18,324 * * * without competitive bids in accordance with the procedure set forth in * * * c. 149, §§ 44A to 44L, inclusive.'

General Laws c. 149, § 180, provides: 'Whoever violates a provision of this chapter for which no specific penalty is provided shall be punished by a fine of not more than one hundred dollars.'

No specific penalty is provided for violations of §§ 44A to 44L. The forerunners of §§ 44A-44L were inserted by St.1939, c. 480, 'An Act requiring fair competition for bidders * * *.' There was included in c. 480 no specific enforcing or penalty section. A specific enforcing section was inserted by St.1954, c. 645, § 4, in a new § 44E which gave substantially the enforcing power now found in § 44K.

It is doubtful whether the General Court intended that the fair bidding statute be subject to § 180. An intent that the statute be enforced by the Department of Labor and Industries is sufficient to account for its insertion in c. 149. This chapter includes many sections which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 cases
  • Leone v. Doran
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • January 22, 1973
    ...and as an improper exercise of the police power. See Commonwealth v. Carpenter, 325 Mass. 519, 521, 91 N.E.2d 666; Commonwealth v. Oliver, 342 Mass. 82, 88, 172 N.E.2d 241; Alegata v. Commonwealth, 353 Mass. 287, 298, 231 N.E.2d The judge's instructions concerning the applicability of G.L. ......
  • Com. v. Bessette
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • June 15, 1966
    ...(see 243 Mass. 472, 489--490, 138 N.E. 296).8 See Commonwealth v. Carpenter, 325 Mass. 519, 521, 91 N.E.2d 666; Commonwealth v. Oliver, 342 Mass. 82, 88, 172 N.E.2d 241; United States v. L. Cohen Grocery Co., 255 U.S. 81, 89--93, 41 S.Ct. 298, 65 L.Ed. 516; Musser v. State of Utah, 333 U.S.......
  • Com. v. Gill
    • United States
    • Appeals Court of Massachusetts
    • May 24, 1977
    ...unlawful. We need not reach those issues as they are unnecessary to the resolution of this case. See generally Commonwealth v. Oliver, 342 Mass. 82, 172 N.E.2d 241 (1961).e. Mass.Adv.Sh. (1976) 1023, 1026--1027.f. Mass.Adv.Sh. (1977) 944, 948, n. 2.7 Even this figure appears to have been ty......
  • Duggan v. City of Taunton
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts Supreme Court
    • December 16, 1971
    ...the commission. See Municipal Light Commn. of City of Taunton v. City of Taunton, 323 Mass. 79, 84, 80 N.E.2d 31; Commonwealth v. Oliver, 342 Mass. 82, 83--85, 172 N.E.2d 241; Municipal Light Commn. of Taunton v. State Employees' Group Ins. Commn., 344 Mass. 533, 534--535, 183 N.E.2d 286. O......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT