Glazier v. People
| Decision Date | 06 June 1977 |
| Docket Number | No. C-863,C-863 |
| Citation | 193 Colo. 268,565 P.2d 935 |
| Parties | Basil David GLAZIER, Petitioner, v. The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Respondent. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Woodrow, Roushar & Weaver, Gerald D. Weaver, Montrose, for petitioner.
J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Jean E. Dubofsky, Deputy Atty. Gen., Edward G. Donovan, Solicitor Gen., Lynne Ford, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, for respondent.
EN BANC.
In September, 1974, the defendant was found guilty of possession of over one-half ounce of cannabis in violation of C.R.S. 1963, 48-5-2. He was sentenced to five to eight years in the State Penitentiary for this felony conviction. The state legislature subsequently changed the crime of possession of less than one ounce of cannabis to a petty offense and reduced the penalty to a $100 fine. Section 12-22-412(12)(a), C.R.S.1973 (Supp. 1976). After the court of appeals had affirmed this conviction, Colo.App., 545 P.2d 727 (1975), but before we considered this case, the trial court held a hearing pursuant to Crim.P. 35(a). The court thereupon resentenced the defendant to a $100 fine and assessed costs. There was no appeal from the judgment by either party and under such circumstances, the new judgment stands as final.
As we have repeatedly held, a defendant is entitled to the benefits of amendatory legislation when relief is sought before finality has attached to the judgment of conviction. People v. Griswold, Colo., 543 P.2d 1251 (1975); Shook v. District Court, 188 Colo. 76, 533 P.2d 41 (1975); People v. Thornton, 187 Colo. 202, 529 P.2d 628 (1974); People v. Thomas, 185 Colo. 395, 525 P.2d 1136 (1974). The defendant therefore stands convicted of a petty offense.
In view of our disposition of this case and statements made by counsel at the oral argument, we find it unnecessary to consider other allegations of error. Since the court of appeals opinion was based on the felony conviction, its judgment is vacated. The cause is remanded to the district court for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
People v. Boyd
...737 P.2d 413, 414 n. 4 (Colo.1987) ; People v. Bloom, 195 Colo. 246, 251–52, 577 P.2d 288, 292 (1978) ; Glazier v. People, 193 Colo. 268, 269, 565 P.2d 935, 936 (1977) ; Truesdale, 190 Colo. at 290, 546 P.2d at 497 ; Naranjo v. Dist. Court, 189 Colo. 21, 23, 536 P.2d 36, 37 (1975) ; Shook v......
-
People v. Stellabotte
...after the date he committed his offense); People v. Truesdale, 190 Colo. 286, 546 P.2d 494, 497 (1976) (same); Glazier v. People, 193 Colo. 268, 565 P.2d 935, 936 (1977) (holding defendant was entitled to subsequent change from felony conviction to petty offense); People v. Bloom, 195 Colo.......
-
People v. Pennington
...changes when a criminal defendant stood to benefit from those amendments. Stellabotte , ¶ 26 ; see, e.g. , Glazier v. People , 193 Colo. 268, 269, 565 P.2d 935, 936 (1977) ("As we have repeatedly held, a defendant is entitled to the benefits of amendatory legislation when relief is sought b......
-
People v. Palmer
...possession of more than 1 ounce of marijuana, when he was convicted of possession of more than 1/2 ounce. We agree. In Glazier v. People, Colo., 565 P.2d 935 (1977), which we find controlling, the Supreme Court, approving the trial court's reduction of the penalty to a $100 fine for a defen......