Jones v. Sheriff, Washoe County
Decision Date | 14 May 1973 |
Docket Number | No. 7303,7303 |
Citation | 89 Nev. 175,509 P.2d 824 |
Parties | Benjamin Davis JONES, Jr., Eddie Lee Bayman, Appellants, v. SHERIFF, WASHOE COUNTY, Nevada, Respondent. |
Court | Nevada Supreme Court |
In a three count indictment returned by the Washoe County Grand Jury, appellants were charged with murder (NRS 200.030), robbery (NRS 200.380) and burglary (NRS 205.060). This appeal 1 is from an order denying their pre-trial petition for habeas relief in the district court and their sole contention is, that since the decision in Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972), they are, as a matter of right entitled to be admitted to bail.
The thrust of their argument is that only capital offenses were non-bailable and that since Furman proscribes the imposition of the death penalty, capital offenses no longer exist. We reject their contention. 2
People v. Anderson, 6 Cal.3d 628, 100 Cal.Rptr. 152, 493 P.2d 880 (Cal.1972), decided several months before Furman, proscribed the imposition of the death penalty in California. The Anderson court, inconsidering the effect of its decision on the question of bail said: '(t)he underlying gravity of (capital) offenses endures and the determination of their gravity for the purpose of bail continues unaffected by this decision . . . we hold they remain as offenses for which bail should be denied . . . when the proof of guilt is evident or the presumption thereof great.' 493 P.2d at 900. Cf. State v. Teeter, 65 Nev. 584, 200 P.2d 657 (1948). We adopt the California view and affirm the order of the trial court.
1 In Bayman v. Sheriff, 89 Nev. ---, 506 P.2d 1259, we affirmed a district court order denying habeas relief where the same parties challenged the grand jury indictment.
2 We are aware that such argument has been accepted in two jurisdictions. See Ex Parte Contella, 485 S.W.2d 910 (Tex.Crim.App.1972), and Edinger v. Metzger, 32 Ohio App.2d 263, 290 N.E.2d 577 (1972). We also note that it has been rejected in several other jurisdictions. See State v. Flood, 263 La. 700, 269 So.2d 212 (1972); Hudson v. McAdory, 268 So.2d 916 (Miss.1972); Donaldson v. Sack, 265 So.2d 499 (Fla.1972). See also, Commonwealth v. Truesdale, 449 Pa. 325, 296 A.2d 829 (1972), which holds that bail may be denied under certain circumstances and State v. Johnson, 61 N.J. 351, 294 A.2d 245 (1972), where...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
State v. Dodson, 37584
...v. Haga, 81 Wash.2d 704, 504 P.2d 787 (banc 1972); See also Ex parte Bynum, 294 Ala. 78, 312 So.2d 52 (1975); Jones v. Sheriff, Washoe County, 89 Nev. 175, 509 P.2d 824 (1973); Roll v. Larson, 30 Utah 2d 271, 516 P.2d 1392 (1973); State v. Flood, 263 La. 700, 269 So.2d 212 (1972); Hudson v.......
-
State v. Ameer
...stating only, "We adopt the California view and affirm the order of the trial court [denying release]." Jones v. Sheriff, Washoe Cty. , 89 Nev. 175, 509 P.2d 824, 824 (1973) (per curiam). As in California and Colorado, the Nevada statutes still facially authorized imposition of capital puni......
-
Maniscalco v. Superior Court
...crimes exception to the right to bail even when there is no possibility of an actual death sentence. (Cf. Jones v. Sheriff, Washoe County (1973) 89 Nev. 175, 509 P.2d 824, 824 ["We adopt the California view" and affirm the denial of bail]; People ex rel. Dunbar v. District Court (1972) 179 ......
-
Ex parte Beverly
...269 So.2d 212 (1972); Blackwell v. Sessums, 284 So.2d 38 (Miss.1973); Hudson v. McAdory, 268 So.2d 916 (Miss.1972); Jones v. Sheriff, Washoe County, , 509 P.2d 824 (Nev.1973); In re Kennedy, 512 P.2d 201 (Okl.Cr.1973); Roll v. Larson, 30 Utah 2d 271, 516 P.2d 1392 (1973); State v. Haga, 81 ......