Jordan v. Jordan
| Decision Date | 08 June 1995 |
| Docket Number | No. 95-0166,95-0166 |
| Citation | 907 S.W.2d 471 |
| Parties | 38 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 782 Kathy Stringer JORDAN and Jerry Jordan, Petitioners, v. Susan B. JORDAN and Ron Jordan, Respondents. |
| Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Curtis W. Fenley, Jr., Lufkin, Michael W. Minton, Dallas, for petitioners.
D. Joe Albright, Lisa H. Pennington, Houston, for respondents.
This case involves the jurisdiction of the court of appeals to review the granting of a bill of review. Because the bill of review in this case was interlocutory, the court of appeals did not have jurisdiction. Pursuant to TEX.R.APP.P. 170, a majority of the Court, without hearing oral argument, grants the application for writ of error, reverses the decision of the court of appeals and dismisses the appeal for want of jurisdiction.
Susan and Ron Jordan sued Kathy and Jerry Jordan in 1990, seeking damages arising from a boating accident in 1989. Suits were filed in both state and federal court. Kathy and Jerry filed an answer in federal court but not in state court. In 1991, the trial court rendered default judgment against Kathy and Jerry. Later that year, Kathy and Jerry initiated a bill of review proceeding, asking the trial court to vacate the prior judgment and render judgment against Susan and Ron. The trial court vacated the prior judgment and ordered a trial on the merits. The court of appeals then reversed the trial court.
A bill of review which sets aside a prior judgment but does not dispose of the case on the merits is interlocutory and not appealable. Tesoro Petroleum v. Smith, 796 S.W.2d 705 (Tex.1990); Warren v. Walter, 414 S.W.2d 423 (Tex.1967). The trial court in this case has ordered a trial on the merits, indicating that all issues are not resolved. Consequently the court of appeals lacked jurisdiction.
To continue reading
Request your trial
- S. Cty. Mutual Ins. Co. v Ochoa
-
In re Estrada
...of an order setting aside a previous judgment by bill of review but not disposing of the case on the merits. See Jordan v. Jordan, 907 S.W.2d 471, 471 (Tex.1995) (per curiam). The order at issue in this case does not dispose of the entire case and is thus interlocutory, so no appeal lies fr......
- Chiriboga v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
-
In re White Inter Vivos Trusts, No. 04-09-00040-CV (Tex. App. 8/31/2009)
...adjudicates the entire controversy." In re J.B.A., 127 S.W.3d 850, 851 (Tex. App.-Fort Worth 2004, no pet.); cf. Jordan v. Jordan, 907 S.W.2d 471, 472 (Tex. 1995) (per curiam) (citing Tesoro Petrol. v. Smith, 796 S.W.2d 705, 705 (Tex. 1990) (per APPELLATE ATTORNEYS' FEES Because West served......