Lingar v. Harlan Fuel Co.
Decision Date | 29 September 1944 |
Citation | 182 S.W.2d 657,298 Ky. 216 |
Parties | LINGAR v. HARLAN FUEL CO. et al. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Harlan County; James S. Forester, Judge.
Personal injury action by White Lingar against Harlan Fuel Company and others. From an adverse judgment, plaintiff appeals.
Affirmed.
Golden & Lay, of Pineville, for appellant.
James R. Sampson, of Harlan, for appellees.
On March 22, 1943, appellant sued the Harlan Fuel Company, a corporation to recover damages for personal injuries allegedly sustained while in its employ on March 23, 1942. A summons was issued against the corporation and delivered to one E. Guthrie, a former officer or employee of the corporation, who, on the second day of the ensuing May term filed his affidavit disclosing that on December 29, 1941, the corporation had been dissolved in the manner prescribed by KRS 271.300; that all steps required by that Statute had been taken, including the publication of newspaper advertisements; that the property of the corporation, by deed duly recorded in the county court clerk's office, had been conveyed to a partnership formed by the stockholders of the corporation to do business under the same name, and that the partnership, on December 29, 1941, had executed and filed in the county court clerk's office a statement to that effect as required by KRS 365.010.
Reciting the facts pertaining to the dissolution of the corporation and stating that he was ignorant of them when he instituted the action, appellant, on May 15, 1943, filed an amended petition making the partnership and its individual members parties defendant, and seeking to hold them liable as successors to the corporation. The partners, in their answer filed at the succeeding August term, pleaded among other defenses the one year Statute of Limitations (KRS 413.140) which appellant in turn sought to avoid by reply. The Court sustained appellees' demurrer to the reply as amended and upon appellant declining to plead further, dismissed his petition. Since the sole question presented on this appeal is whether appellees were estopped by the facts alleged in the amended reply from pleading limitation in bar of appellant's action, we quote the amended reply as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Gailor v. Alsabi
...cases have any factual similarity to the case sub judice. The facts of our case are more similar to those in Lingar v. Harlan Fuel Co., 298 Ky. 216, 182 S.W.2d 657 (1944), in which an employee attempted to sue his employer for personal injuries, but did not realize that the employer had dis......
-
Campbell v. S. Health Partners, Inc., CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-62-HRW-CJS
...Health Services Agreement, which is a matter of public record, which Plaintiff is charged with knowing. See Lingar v. Harlan Fuel Co., 182 S.W.2d 657, 659 (Ky. 1944); Gailor v. Alsabi, 990 S.W.2d 597, 602 (Ky. 1999). Plaintiff did not consider this information and whether it pointed to SHP ......
-
Williams v. Hawkins
...who has been guilty of no act calculated to induce the party claiming ignorance to refrain from investigating." Lingar v. Harlan Fuel Co., 298 Ky. 216, 182 S.W.2d 657, 659 (1944). Here, readily available public information documented Charlotte’s death approximately seven months after the mo......
- Lingar v. Harlan Fuel Co.