People v. Hall

Decision Date13 December 1979
Citation48 N.Y.2d 927,425 N.Y.S.2d 56
Parties, 401 N.E.2d 179 The PEOPLE of the State of New York, Respondent, v. James HALL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
OPINION OF THE COURT MEMORANDUM.

The order of the County Court should be reversed and the information dismissed.

It is a fundamental and nonwaivable jurisdictional prerequisite that an information state the crime with which the defendant is charged and the particular facts constituting that crime (People v. Case, 42 N.Y.2d 98, 99, 396 N.Y.S.2d 841, 842, 365 N.E.2d 872, 873; People v. Harper, 37 N.Y.2d 96, 99, 371 N.Y.S.2d 467, 469, 332 N.E.2d 336, 337; People v. McGuire, 5 N.Y.2d 523, 525, 186 N.Y.S.2d 250, 251, 158 N.E.2d 830, 832). In order for an information to be sufficient on its face, every element of the offense charged and the defendant's commission thereof must be alleged (CPL 100.40, subd. 1, par. (c); 100.15, subd. 3).

Here the information charging harassment recited only that defendant, who it also alleges indicated that his desire was that the complainant leave the defendant's premises, "did strike, shove and otherwise subject (the complainant) to physical contact and threatened * * * physical harm." It failed to specify an essential element of the crime, which is that the acts be done "with intent to harass, annoy or alarm" (Penal Law, § 240.25). Absent such an allegation, the acts complained of did not constitute criminal conduct and, hence, defendant's conviction was jurisdictionally defective (see People v. Case, supra; People v. McGuire, supra ).

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and MEYER, JJ., concur in memorandum.

Order reversed, etc.

To continue reading

Request your trial
74 cases
  • People v. Coles
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • November 28, 1988
    ...in spite of the failure to make a pre-conviction motion, if the court never obtained subject matter jurisdiction (People v. Hall, 48 N.Y.2d 927, 425 N.Y.S.2d 56, 401 N.E.2d 179; People v. Patterson, 39 N.Y.2d 288, 295, 383 N.Y.S.2d 573, 347 N.E.2d 898, supra ). The claim in the instant case......
  • People v. Crisci
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • March 16, 2012
    ...an accusatory part, designating the offense charged, CPL § 100.15(2), setting forth every element thereof, People v. Hall, 48 N.Y.2d 927, 425 N.Y.S.2d 56, 401 N.E.2d 179 (1979), and a factual part containing “a statement of the complainant alleging facts of an evidentiary character supporti......
  • People v. Huhn
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • January 30, 2012
    ...contains an accusatory part, designating the offense charged, CPL § 100.15(2), setting forth every element thereof, People v. Hall, 48 N.Y.2d 927, 425 N.Y.S.2d 56 (1979), and a factual part containing “a statement of the complainant alleging facts of an evidentiary character supporting or t......
  • People v. Maradiaga
    • United States
    • New York District Court
    • August 1, 2012
    ...contains an accusatory part, designating the offense charged, CPL § 100.15(2), setting forth every element thereof, People v. Hall, 48 N.Y.2d 927, 425 N.Y.S.2d 56 (1979), and a factual part containing “a statement of the complainant alleging facts of an evidentiary character supporting or t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT