People v. Zinn, No. 92SA9

• Docket Nº: No. 92SA9
• Citation: 843 P.2d 1351
• Case Date: January 11, 1993
• Court: Supreme Court of Colorado

Page 1351

843 P.2d 1351 PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael ZINN, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92SA9. Supreme Court of Colorado,
En Banc. Jan. 11, 1993.

Page 1352

Alexander M. Hunter, Dist. Atty., Twentieth Judicial Dist., William F. Nagel, Appellate Deputy Dist. Atty., Boulder, for plaintiff-appellant.

Lawrence S. Mertes, P.C., Lawrence S. Mertes, Boulder, for defendant-appellee.

Justice KIRSHBAUM delivered the Opinion of the Court.

The People appeal the trial court's judgment declaring section 42-2-122(1)(l ), 17 C.R.S. (1984 & 1991 Supp.), unconstitutional as violative of the due process rights of the defendant, Michael Zinn. ¹ This statute requires a trial court to confiscate a defendant's driver's license immediately upon the defendant's conviction for the unlawful use, sale or possession of a controlled substance ² and to forward that license, together with a notice of the defendant's conviction, to the Department of Motor Vehicles. We reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.

I

On April 12, 1991, Zinn sold 3.5 grams of cocaine to an undercover informant in a Boulder County, Colorado, supermarket parking lot. On April 30, 1991, the defendant again sold 3.5 grams of cocaine to another undercover informant at the same location. Upon searching defendant's residence pursuant to a search warrant, police authorities seized 8.4 grams of cocaine from the defendant's home and an additional 27.58 grams of cocaine from his parked vehicle.

On July 12, 1991, the defendant entered guilty pleas to two counts of possession and sale of cocaine, in violation of section 18-18-105, 8B C.R.S. (1986 & 1991 Supp.). At the sentencing hearing on August 23, 1991, the trial court imposed concurrent sentences of four years' probation and sixth months of home detention. The trial court also continued the case for consideration of issues raised by the defendant concerning the statutory requirement of revocation of the defendant's driver's license.

On August 26, 1991, the defendant filed a motion requesting a declaration that section 42-2-122(1)(l ) was unconstitutional. The defendant argued, inter alia, that the statute violated his rights to due process of

Page 1353

law ³ because it constitutes a taking of a protected property interest on grounds which bear no reasonable relationship to public health, safety or welfare and because the statute requires no nexus between the offense committed and the act of driving. ⁴ The trial court granted the motion, concluding that the sanction of revocation of an offender's driver's license for the offense of possession and sale of a controlled substance had no reasonable relationship to the public health, safety and welfare in circumstances wherein the defendant's use, operation, or possession of a motor vehicle was not directly related to the commission of the offense. II

Although the defendant challenges only the constitutionality of section 42-2-122(1)(l ), several related statutes delineate the procedures by which the Department of Motor Vehicles (the department) is required to revoke the driver's license of a convicted drug offender. Section 42-2-123.6 provides in pertinent part as follows:

Immediately upon a plea of guilty or a verdict of guilty by the court or a jury, to an offense for which revocation of a license is mandatory pursuant to section 42-2-122(1)(l ), the court shall require the offender to immediately surrender his driver's license to the court. The court shall forward to the department a notice of conviction, together with the offender's license, not later than five days after the conviction becomes final....

§ 42-2-123.6, 17 C.R.S. (1991 Supp.). Section 42-2-122(1)(l ) requires the department to revoke the license of a driver upon receiving notice of a conviction showing that the driver has "[b]een convicted of any felony offense provided for in [sections 18-18-104 to -106, 8B C.R.S. (1986 & 1991 Supp.) ]." § 42-2-122(1)(l ), 17 C.R.S. (1984 & 1991 Supp.). Sections 18-18-104 to -106, 8B C.R.S. (1986 & 1991 Supp.), define the offenses of unlawful use, sale and possession of controlled substances.

Certain basic principles of constitutional adjudication are applicable to the issue here presented....