Perkins v. Sykes
| Decision Date | 01 March 1950 |
| Docket Number | No. 738,738 |
| Citation | 231 N.C. 488,57 S.E.2d 645 |
| Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
| Parties | PERKINS, v. SYKES. |
A. H. Graham, Hillsboro, and L. J. Phipps, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff, appellee.
J. Grover Lee and R. M. Gantt, Durham, for defendant, appellant.
The judgment adjudicates the issue raised by the defendant's cross-action, i. e., the title to the real and personal property used in carrying on the business of the E. P. Sykes Motor Company. It also judicially declares the right of the plaintiff to have an accounting of the partnership affairs in conformity to the prayer of the third cause of action stated in the complaint. But it leaves the first and second causes of action set out in the complaint wholly untried, and postpones the actual taking of the account of the partnership affairs to a later occasion.
For these reasons, the judgment is a partial one, not disposing of the whole case. In consequence, the appeal is fragmentary and premature, and must be dismissed. Cole v. Farmers Bank & Trust Co., 221 N.C. 249, 20 S.E.2d 54; Garland v. Linville Improvement Co., 184 N.C. 551, 115 S.E. 164; Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips, 182 N.C. 437, 109 S.E. 257; Hinton v. Life Ins. Co., 116 N.C. 22, 21 S.E. 201; McIntosh on North Carolina Practice and Procedure in Civil Cases, section 676(7).
When the whole action is tried, an appeal will lie from the final judgment upon the whole controversy. Penn-Allen Cement Co. v. Phillips, supra.
Appeal dismissed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Revolutionary Concepts, Inc. v. Clements Walker, PLLC
...to immediate appellate review. Steele v. Hauling Co., 260 N.C. 486, 491, 133 S.E.2d 197, 201 (1963) (citing Perkins v. Sykes, 231 N.C. 488, 490, 57 S.E.2d 645, 646 (1950)); Goldston v. American Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723, 725, 392 S.E.2d 735, 736 (1990). The rule precluding immediate appell......
-
Hamilton v. Mortgage Info. Serv. Inc.
...be appealed to the appellate courts. Steele v. Hauling Co., 260 N.C. 486, 491, 133 S.E.2d 197, 201 (1963) (citing Perkins v. Sykes, 231 N.C. 488, 490, 57 S.E.2d 645, 646 (1950)); Goldston v. American Motors Corp., 326 N.C. 723, 725, 392 S.E.2d 735, 736 (1990) (stating that “there is no righ......
-
Harbour Point Homeowners' Ass'n Inc v. Djf Enter.S Inc, COA09-1545.
...a final judgment.” Steele v. Moore-Flesher Hauling Co., 260 N.C. 486, 491, 133 S.E.2d 197, 201 (1963) (citing Perkins v. Sykes, 231 N.C. 488, 490, 57 S.E.2d 645, 646 (1950)). As a result, we must first consider whether Plaintiff is entitled to appellate review of this interlocutory B. Certi......
-
State v. Ward
...Carolina an appeal will only lie from a final judgment. Stanback v. Stanback, 287 N.C. 448, 215 S.E.2d 30 (1975); Perkins v. Sykes, 231 N.C. 488, 57 S.E.2d 645 (1950). In criminal cases, there is no appeal as a matter of right from an interlocutory order. State v. Black, 7 N.C.App. 324, 172......