REGIONAL RET. LIV. v. WAPELLO COUNTY BOARD
Citation | 611 N.W.2d 779 |
Decision Date | 01 June 2000 |
Docket Number | No. 98-1839.,98-1839. |
Parties | REGIONAL RETIREMENT LIVING, INC. dba Sylvan Woods, Appellant, v. The BOARD OF REVIEW OF WAPELLO COUNTY, Iowa, Wapello County Assessor, Wapello County Iowa, Wapello County Treasurer, and Wapello County Auditor, Appellees. |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of Iowa |
David J. Dutton and Lynn M. Smith, Dutton, Braun, Staack & Hellman, P.L.C., Waterloo, for appellant.
Victoria R. Siegel, Wapello County Attorney, for appellees.
Considered en banc.
Plaintiff, Regional Retirement Living, Inc. (Sylvan Woods), sought tax relief through the judiciary. Plaintiff's petition was dismissed for failure to exhaust all administrative remedies. We affirm the decision of the district court.
Plaintiff, Sylvan Woods, filed for a property tax exemption based on its contention it was a nonprofit corporation devoted exclusively to charitable, religious, educational, and scientific endeavors under Iowa Code section 427.1(8) (1997). Sylvan Woods' claim was timely filed on June 30, 1998 in accordance with Iowa Code section 427.1(14). On July 27 of that year, Sylvan Woods' application was denied by the Wapello County Assessor's Office. Sylvan Woods lodged an appeal with the district court, which was subsequently dismissed on the ground plaintiff failed to exhaust its administrative remedies, thereby relieving the district court of the authority to hear the matter.
Plaintiff appeals, asserting the administrative procedures in question were inapplicable, and that compliance was unrealistic.
A plaintiff's failure to exhaust an administrative remedy deprives the district court of authority to rule on the case. State v. Clark, 608 N.W.2d 5, 7 (Iowa 2000); Shors v. Johnson, 581 N.W.2d 648, 650 (Iowa 1998). Questions of jurisdiction, venue, and authority of the district court are legal issues reviewed for correction of errors at law. Clark, 608 N.W.2d at 7; Shors, 581 N.W.2d at 650.
Id. § 427.1(14).
Plaintiff complied with these requirements and was denied an exemption. At issue is whether Sylvan Woods' appeal of that decision was appropriately filed with the district court, or whether its failure to exhaust other administrative remedies precluded the court from hearing the matter.
It is well established that a party must exhaust any available administrative remedy before seeking relief in the courts. Shors, 581 N.W.2d at 650. This doctrine applies when (1) an adequate administrative remedy exists, and (2) the governing statute requires the remedy to be exhausted before allowing judicial review. Id.
Iowa Code section 441.37 provides:
This statute is directly applicable to claims of the nature advanced by plaintiff. See City of Council Bluffs v. Pottawattamie County, 254 N.W.2d 18, 20 (Iowa 1977)
[hereinafter Pottawattamie] (city seeking exemption of property from the tax rolls must appeal to review board). The board of review was created by the legislature for the express purpose of addressing complaints regarding the classification and assessment of property.
Griswold Land & Credit Co. v. Calhoun County, 198 Iowa 1240, 1242, 201 N.W. 11, 12 (1924). Such complaints must be heard by the board before judicial relief may be had. Pottawattamie, 254 N.W.2d at 20. Its jurisdiction in these matters is exclusive of all other remedies allowed by law. Griswold, 198 Iowa at 1242, 201 N.W. at 12.
The difficulty with which we are confronted lies in the apparent discrepancy between sections 441.37 and 427.1(14). Under the latter statute, organizations have until July 1 to petition the county for an exemption. Iowa Code § 427.1(14). Appeals, however, must be submitted by May 5. Id. § 441.37. Section 441.37 makes no provision for the appeal of a denied application filed between May 5 and July 1. For this reason, plaintiff asserts no adequate administrative remedy exists, and that it should therefore be permitted to pursue relief through the courts.
In response, the board claims the two statutes are independent of one another. It posits an aggrieved entity, which receives notification of a tax liability at the beginning of the year, may automatically file an appeal between April 16 and May 5, regardless of whether the entity has complied with section 427.1(14), which the board describes as an unrelated filing...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Taylor v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, No. 8-338/07-1580 (Iowa App. 10/1/2008)
... ... from the Iowa District Court for Woodbury County, Duane E. Hoffmeyer, Judge ... ...
-
Ghost Player, L.L.C. v. State
...1999). We review the authority of the district court to hear a case for correction of errors at law. Reg'l Ret. Living, Inc. v. Bd. of Review, 611 N.W.2d 779, 781 (Iowa 2000) (per curiam). We review Ghost Player's constitutional claim de novo. Hensler v. City of Davenport, 790 N.W.2d 569, 5......
-
William v. City of Coralville, No. 9-718/09-0269 (Iowa App. 11/25/2009), 9-718/09-0269
...the governing statute requires the remedy to be exhausted before allowing judicial review." Id.; accord Regional Ret. Living, Inc. v. Bd. of Review, 611 N.W.2d at 779, 781 (Iowa 2000). The City's argument is as follows: Once Coralville had approved the annexation petition, the petition's ne......
- City of Sioux City v. Freese, 98-2193.