State v. Hubbard, 21695

Decision Date14 April 1982
Docket NumberNo. 21695,21695
Citation277 S.C. 568,290 S.E.2d 817
CourtSouth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesThe STATE, Respondent, v. Ronald J. HUBBARD, David C. Lerette, Bobby Newman, Donna Pardew, and James E. Starnes, Appellants.

David A. Fedor, Columbia, for appellants.

Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod, Asst. Atty. Gen. Lindy P. Funkhouser and Sol. James C. Anders, Columbia, for respondent.

PER CURIAM:

The appellants are charged with gambling and operating a gambling house. Before the jury was sworn, the appellants moved to suppress evidence seized in a search of the premises where they were arrested. This appeal is from the denial of that motion. We dismiss the appeal.

The appellants have not yet gone to trial. An appeal in a criminal case must attend the final judgment rendered on the indictment. State v. McMillan, 189 S.C. 444, 1 S.E.2d 626 (1939). No final judgment has occurred in this case and the order appealed from is interlocutory. State v. Thomas, 275 S.C. 274, 269 S.E.2d 768 (1980).

Therefore, we dismiss the appeal and remand the case for trial.

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State v. Isaac
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • August 21, 2013
    ...112 (1990) (an order committing the defendant to the Department of Mental Health is not immediately appealable); State v. Hubbard, 277 S.C. 568, 569, 290 S.E.2d 817, 817 (1982) (the denial of a motion to suppress evidence is not immediately appealable); State v. Lockhart, 275 S.C. 160, 161,......
  • State v. Miller
    • United States
    • South Carolina Supreme Court
    • February 11, 1986
    ...State v. Dingle, 279 S.C. 278, 306 S.E.2d 223 (1983) [order committing defendant to Department of Mental Health]; State v. Hubbard, 277 S.C. 568, 290 S.E.2d 817 (1982) [denial of motion to suppress evidence]; State v. Parker, 267 S.C. 317, 227 S.E.2d 677 (1976) [denial of motion to quash in......
  • State v. Reece
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 2018
    ...Thus, Reece's filing of the notice of appeal from the order did not divest the trial judge of jurisdiction. See State v. Hubbard, 277 S.C. 568, 569, 290 S.E.2d 817, 817 (1982) (dismissing an appeal from the trial court's interlocutory order denying a motion to suppress, noting "[a]n appeal ......
  • State v. Reece
    • United States
    • South Carolina Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 2018
    ... ... Reece's filing of the notice of appeal from the order did ... not divest the trial judge of jurisdiction. See State v ... Hubbard, 277 S.C. 568, 569, 290 S.E.2d 817, 817 (1982) ... (dismissing an appeal from the trial court's ... interlocutory order denying a motion ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT