Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Study

Decision Date07 January 1994
Docket NumberNo. 93-45,93-45
Citation866 P.2d 1288
PartiesTHUNDER BASIN COAL COMPANY, Petitioner, v. Shirley A. STUDY, Campbell County Treasurer, Respondent.
CourtWyoming Supreme Court

Alan B. Minier of Rothgerber, Appel, Powers & Johnson, Cheyenne, for petitioner.

Russell A. Hansen, Campbell County Pros. Atty., Gillette, for respondent.

Before MACY, C.J., and THOMAS, CARDINE, GOLDEN and TAYLOR, JJ.

MACY, Chief Justice.

Petitioner Thunder Basin Coal Company petitioned the district court for review of the refusal of Respondent Shirley A. Study, Campbell County Treasurer, to accept a certified check for deposit into an escrow account in an amount equal to all the disputed ad valorem taxes. The district court certified the matter to this Court pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b).

We are asked to answer the following question:

Can the county treasurer require the deposit of disputed interest and penalty, plus taxes in order to establish an interest bearing escrow account pursuant to W.S. § 39-4-101(d)?

We answer this question in the negative. We hold that the county treasurer may not require payment of interest and penalty and that she must accept payment of the disputed taxes for deposit into an escrow account.

The facts of this case are uncontroverted. Thunder Basin owns and operates two surface coal mines located in Campbell County, Wyoming, known as the Black Thunder Mine and the Coal Creek Mine. The tax auditors for the State of Wyoming audited the mines' records for the production years of 1978 through 1988. The original tax liability for the years in question had been properly paid.

After the audit was completed, the State Department of Revenue sent a letter to Thunder Basin, notifying it that the taxable value of the mines should be revised and increased for the years in question. The letter contained a revised severance tax assessment and indicated that the State Department of Revenue claimed no interest or penalties. Thunder Basin filed a timely appeal from this determination with the State Board of Equalization and deposited the amount of the disputed severance taxes into the state escrow account.

On October 7, 1992, the State Department of Revenue certified the increase in the taxable valuation of the mines to Campbell County, and the county treasurer sent tax notices to Thunder Basin. The tax notices requested payment of additional ad valorem taxes for the years in question. The notices also sought payment of interest, as calculated by the county treasurer, on the tax amounts.

After a series of discussions and correspondence between Thunder Basin and the Campbell County attorney regarding the interest claims, Thunder Basin tendered a certified check to the county treasurer for the amount of the disputed ad valorem taxes. The county treasurer refused to accept the check because the amount tendered did not include interest. Thunder Basin filed a petition with the district court for review of the county treasurer's decision. The district court certified the matter to this Court for resolution pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b).

When a case is certified to this Court pursuant to W.R.A.P. 12.09(b): "[W]e must review the decision 'under the appellate standards applicable to a reviewing court of the first instance.' " Amax Coal Company v. Wyoming State Board of Equalization, 819 P.2d 825, 828 (Wyo.1991) (quoting Campbell County v. Wyoming Community College Commission, 731 P.2d 1174, 1175 (Wyo.1987)), quoted in Texaco, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization, 845 P.2d 398, 399 (Wyo.1993). The scope of our review of administrative decisions is defined by Wyo.Stat. § 16-3-114(c) (1990).

The Legislature gave taxpayers the opportunity to have payments for disputed taxes deposited into an escrow account under Wyo.Stat. § 39-4-101(d) (Supp.1993):

(d) If taxes are paid under protest due to an appeal pending before the state board of equalization, the county treasurer shall deposit the amount under appeal in an interest bearing escrow account and withhold distribution until a final decision on the appeal has been rendered. If the taxpayer prevails in the appeal, the county treasurer shall refund the amount under appeal, plus interest earned, to the taxpayer within thirty (30) days from the day the final decision is rendered.

Thunder Basin contends that, under the language of § 39-4-101(d), only the disputed tax amount must be tendered to the county treasurer. The county treasurer argues that the statutory provision requires the taxpayer to pay interest on the disputed tax amount as well as the principal of the taxes.

In construing a statute, we must determine whether the statute is clear or ambiguous.

A "statute is unambiguous if its...

To continue reading

Request your trial
24 cases
  • Bp America Production v. Dept. of Revenue
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • March 14, 2006
    ...rule of law has not been invoked and correctly applied, . . . the agency's errors are to be corrected.'" Thunder Basin Coal Company v. Study, 866 P.2d 1288, 1291 (Wyo.1994) (quoting Devous v. Wyoming State Board of Medical Examiners, 845 P.2d 408, 414 (Wyo.1993))." Celotex Corporation v. An......
  • Adams v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers Safety and Compensation Div.
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • February 25, 1999
    ...and interpretation when the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous. E.g., Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Study, No. 93-45, 1994 WL 2811 (Wyo. Jan. 7, 1994) [866 P.2d 1288 (Wyo.1994) ]; Wyoming State Tax Comm'n v. BHP Petroleum Co., Inc., 856 P.2d 428 (Wyo.1993); Jackson State Bank v. Kin......
  • State Dept. of Revenue and Taxation v. Pacificorp
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • April 15, 1994
    ...does not resort to rules of statutory construction. Parker Land and Cattle Company, 845 P.2d at 1043. See also Thunder Basin Coal Company v. Study, 866 P.2d 1288 (Wyo.1994). Section 9(b) defined the terms " '[p]roperty necessary for and devoted to elimination, control or prevention of air, ......
  • General Chemical Corp. v. Unemployment Ins. Com'n, Div. of Unemployment Ins., Dept. of Employment
    • United States
    • Wyoming Supreme Court
    • September 15, 1995
    ...v. Oedekoven, 888 P.2d 228, 230 (Wyo.1995); City of Cheyenne v. Reiman Corp., 869 P.2d 125, 128-29 (Wyo.1994); Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Study, 866 P.2d 1288, 1290 (Wyo.1994). The Department relies principally upon the language of WYO.STAT. § 27-3-503(f), above, to sustain its determination......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT