Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio

Decision Date02 November 1965
Docket NumberNo. 65-214,65-214
Citation179 So.2d 400
PartiesSamuel DEL VECCHIO, Executor of the Estate of Domenico Del Vecchio, Deceased, Appellant, v. Josephine DEL VECCHIO, Appellee.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Patton & Kanner and Barry N. Semet, Miami, for appellant.

Fuller Warren and Verne L. Freeland, Miami, for appellee.

Before CARROLL, BARKDULL and SWANN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, plaintiff in the trial court, seeks review of an adverse summary final decree entered by the chancellor upon the affirmative defense of res adjudicata.

This cause had been many times before the appellate courts of this State. See: Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1961, 132 So.2d 771; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.1962, 143 So.2d 17; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.1963, 152 So.2d 457; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1963, 157 So.2d 530; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.App.1964, 161 So.2d 728; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.1964, 162 So.2d 665.

From the record in this cause and the previous opinions of the appellate courts, it is apparent that the issues attempted to be raised in the instant action were raised, could have or should have been raised in the prior proceedings. Therefore, the chancellor's granting of a summary final decree upon the principle of res adjudicata was eminently correct, and the decree here under review is hereby affirmed on the authority of: Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617; Wolfson v. Rubin, Fla.1951, 52 So.2d 344; Litt v. Jarson, Fla.App.1957, 97 So.2d 46; Stadler v. Cherry Hill Developers, Inc., Fla.App.1963, 150 So.2d 468; 19 Fla.Jur., Judgments and Decrees, § 120.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial
6 cases
  • Seaboard Coast Line Railroad Co. v. Gulf Oil Corp.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • April 2, 1969
    ...in support of the claim already litigated in the Florida courts. Hinchee v. Fisher, Fla.1957, 93 So.2d 351, 353; Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1965, 179 So.2d 400. In Williamson v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp., 3 Cir. 1950, 186 F.2d 464, 470, cert. denied, 341 U.S. 921, 71 S.......
  • Media Placement, Inc. v. Combined Broadcasting, Inc., 95-118
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 6, 1995
    ...barring "any other admissible matter that might have been offered" to sustain a claim in the prior action); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 179 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); Smith v. Florida East Coast Ry., 151 So.2d 70 (Fla. 3d DCA 1963), cert. discharged, 162 So.2d 663 Affirmed. ...
  • ICC Chemical Corp. v. Freeman, 93-2555
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • July 5, 1994
    ...and determined in the prior action, whether they were or not. Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 179 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965); 32 Fla.Jur.2d Judgments and Decrees Sec. 115 (1981). The issues of bad faith allegedly arising out of the facsimile ......
  • Metro Ford, Inc. v. Green, 98-1604
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 27, 1999
    ...in the prior action, whether they were or not). See also Hay v. Salisbury, 92 Fla. 446, 109 So. 617 (1926); Del Vecchio v. Del Vecchio, 179 So.2d 400 (Fla. 3d DCA 1965). Accordingly, the circuit court's ruling results in affording opportunity for the pursuit of justice, rather than its The ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT