Waterman v. Los Angeles County General Hospital
| Decision Date | 11 February 1954 |
| Citation | 123 Cal.App.2d 143,266 P.2d 221 |
| Court | California Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
| Parties | WATERMAN v. LOS ANGELES COUNTY GENERAL HOSPITAL et al. Civ. 19811. |
Elbert E. Hensley and Allan M. Carson, Los Angeles, for appellant.
Harold W. Kennedy, County Counsel, and Lloyd S. Davis, Deputy County Counsel, Los Angeles, for respondent.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of dismissal entered on an order sustaining the demurrer of defendant County of Los Angeles to the complaint without leave to amend in an action for damages for malpractice.
The complaint alleges: the corporate capacity of the County of Los Angeles; it operates the Los Angeles County Hospital, referred to as 'the hospital'; about November 4, 1951, plaintiff, by accident, sustained an injury to his right leg by which the lower third of the tibia and fibula were fractured; immediately after the accident, he entered and was received into the hospital for care and treatment of his leg; he engaged a room, agreed with the agents of defendant county to pay for it and for care and treatment, and defendant county, by its agents, pursuant to the agreement, received him as a patient in the hospital; he remained in the hospital until November 23, 1951; as a proximate result of the negligence of defendant's employees, he was caused great pain and suffering, the fractures were not set properly, in removing a cast the leg was broken again, infection set in,--all to his damage; within one year of the injury he filed a verified claim with the board of supervisors, which was denied.
The demurrer was sustained on the ground the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The question is whether a county which operates a general hospital and imposes a charge for care and treatment is immune from liability in tort for the negligence of its agents.
The law is firmly established in this state that a county, in operating a general hospital, does so in a governmental capacity; that the imposition of a charge for service by such a hospital is not inconsistent with the exercise of a governmental function; and that a county is not liable for the negligence of its employees toward patients therein. The Supreme Court has decided the point too recently to make discussion profitable. Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hosp. Dist., 41 Cal.2d 33, 257 P.2d 22. See, also, Davie v. Board of Regents, etc., 66 Cal.App. 693, 700, 227 P. 243.
The briefs are largely given to arguments pro and con on the desirability of abolishing or modifying the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Jerauld County v. St. Paul-Mercury Indem. Co., PAUL-MERCURY
... ... acts supplementary thereto, established and maintained a county hospital designated and known as Memorial Hospital. It was managed by a Board of ... In this general duty is included, among other things, the specific duty to provide ... Elliott v. Lea County, 58 N.M. 147, 267 P.2d 131; Waterman v. Los ... Angeles County General Hospital, 123 Cal.App.2d 143, 266 P.2d ... ...
-
Vater v. Glenn County
...matter (see Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hosp. Dist., 41 Cal.2d 33, 41, 257 P.2d 22; Waterman v. Los Angeles County General Hospital, 123 Cal.App.2d 143, 144, 266 P.2d 221), and, where, as here, the Legislature has clearly expressed its intention to maintain immunity, that intention ......
-
Lee v. Dunklee
...for service on those able to pay is not inconsistent with the exercise of a governmental function. Waterman v. Los Angeles County General Hospital, 123 Cal.App.2d 143, 266 P.2d 221; Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital Dist., 41 Cal.2d 33, 257 P.2d 22; and 25 A.L.R.2d 229, and cases......
-
Fonseca v. Santa Clara County
...(See Talley v. Northern San Diego County Hospital District (1953) 41 Cal.2d 33, 39, 257 P.2d 22; Waterman v. Los Angeles County General Hospital (1954) 123 Cal.App.2d 143, 144, 266 P.2d 221; and Calkins v. Newton (1939) 36 Cal.App.2d 262, 264, 267--268, 97 P.2d 523.) She asserts that any de......