White v. State
| Decision Date | 12 October 2004 |
| Docket Number | No. S04A1394.,S04A1394. |
| Citation | 278 Ga. 499,604 S.E.2d 159 |
| Parties | WHITE v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Bernadette C. Crucilla, Macon, for appellant.
Howard Z. Simms, Dist. Atty., Gregory W. Winters, Asst. Dist. Atty., Thurbert E. Baker, Atty Gen., Andrette Watson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.
A jury found Antonio Dewayne White guilty of felony murder while in the commission of attempted armed robbery, a separate count of the underlying attempted armed robbery, two counts of armed robbery, and two counts of aggravated assault. The trial court entered judgments of conviction and imposed three consecutive sentences of life imprisonment for the felony murder and armed robbery charges. Additionally, the trial court sentenced White to consecutive twenty-year terms for the aggravated assault charges and to a concurrent ten-year term for attempted armed robbery, all of which are to be served on probation. The trial court denied a motion for new trial, and White appealed to the Court of Appeals, which properly transferred the case to this Court.1
1. In his sole enumeration of error, White contends that the evidence is not sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find beyond a reasonable doubt that he was a party to the crimes.
Construed in support of the verdicts, the evidence shows the following: White and four others who were riding in the same car engaged in two violent incidents. During the first, they pulled behind the car of Walter Bivens and robbed him at gun-point. After taking items of personal property, they forced him out of his car, prompting him to flee from the scene as shots were fired at him. According to Mr. Bivens, all parties except the driver exited the car. The second incident occurred soon thereafter at a cookout in an apartment complex. White and the others left the car, and at least one began firing a gun, ordering the victims to "give it up." Leon Wimberly, a co-indictee, shot and killed Terrence Thomas. Although Wimberly testified that White did not have prior knowledge of the robbery plan, Wimberly originally told police that White and two others pointed a gun at him and ordered him to commit the crime.
"While mere presence at the scene of the commission of a crime is not sufficient evidence to convict one of being a party thereto, presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred." [Cit.]
Johnson v. State, 275 Ga. 650, 654(8), 571 S.E.2d 782 (2002). White admitted that he was not the driver and that he left the car during the first incident, willingly reentered the car, and went with the others to another crime scene. Furthermore, Mr. Bivens testified that all occupants other than the driver exited the vehicle and actively participated in the attack. A rational trier of fact clearly could infer White's participation and criminal intent from this evidence. See Felder v. State, 270 Ga. 641, 642(1), 644(4), 514 S.E.2d 416 (1999); Walsh v. State, 269 Ga. 427, 429(1), 499 S.E.2d 332 (1998).
As to the second incident, White argues that Wimberly's prior statement is not sufficient evidence to support the verdicts because it was retracted at trial and was uncorroborated. However, Berry v. State, 268 Ga. 437, 438(1), 490 S.E.2d 389 (1997). See also Gibbons v. State, 248 Ga. 858, 862, 286 S.E.2d 717 (1982). Thus, Wimberly's pre-trial statement constituted substantive evidence of White's guilt, and it was within the province of the jury to believe that statement and to reject Wimberly's testimony at trial. Berry v. State, supra. Furthermore, Jones v. State, 271 Ga. 433, 434, 520 S.E.2d 690 (1999). The jury could find that White's own statement, Jones v. State, supra.
Accordingly, we conclude that a rational trier of fact could find beyond a reasonable doubt that White was guilty as a party to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Higuera–hernandez v. the State.
...Therefore, that separate judgment and sentence, even though not enumerated as error, must be vacated. [Cits.]White v. State, 278 Ga. 499, 501(2), 604 S.E.2d 159 (2004). 2. Appellant contends that the testimony of Flores Calderon regarding inculpatory statements allegedly made by Appellant w......
-
Gonzalez v. State
...evidence, and is not limited in value only to impeachment purposes." (Citations and punctuation omitted.) White v. State, 278 Ga. 499, 500(1), 604 S.E.2d 159 (2004). A felony conviction based upon the testimony of an accomplice must be corroborated by independent evidence, but the sufficien......
-
Westmoreland v. The State.Williams
...circumstances from which one's participation in the criminal intent may be inferred. [Cit.]” (Punctuation omitted.) White v. State, 278 Ga. 499, 500(1), 604 S.E.2d 159 (2004). From the evidence of record a rational trier of fact could infer Williams' participation in and criminal intent to ......
-
Potts v. State, A14A2350.
...this Court have approved the additional language incorporated into the trial court's charge on mere presence. See White v. State, 278 Ga. 499, 500(1), 604 S.E.2d 159 (2004) (citation and punctuation omitted); McKenzie v. State, 283 Ga.App. 555, 558, 642 S.E.2d 187 (2007) (citation and punct......