Ex parte Monroe County Bd. of Educ.
Decision Date | 14 May 2010 |
Docket Number | 1090387. |
Citation | 48 So.3d 621,262 Ed. Law Rep. 702 |
Parties | Ex parte MONROE COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION and Frankye Beal. (In re Pamela Jones Al-Sulaibe, as next friend of Rashid Jones, a minor child v. Monroe County Board of Education and Frankye Beal). |
Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Mark S. Boardman and Clay R. Carr of Boardman, Carr, Hutcheson & Bennett, P.C., Chelsea, for petitioners.
Debbie Lindsey Jared of Jared & Brunson, Elba, for respondent.
The Monroe County Board of Education ("the Board") and Frankye Beal, a fifth-grade teacher at Beatrice Elementary School in Monroe County, petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing Judge Dawn W. Hare to grant their motions for a summary judgment dismissing Pamela Jones Al-Sulaibe's tort claims against them because, they say, they are entitled to immunity-absolute immunity as to the Board and State-agent immunity as to Beal. We grant the petition and issue the writ as to the Board; we deny the petition as to Beal.
On February 27, 2007, Beal disciplined then 12-year-old Rashid Jones for having repeatedly disrupted his fifth-grade class. Jones was repeating the fifth grade and was two years older than most of his classmates. In the hall outside the classroom, Beal initially attempted to "hand-paddle" Jones using two rulers taped together to strike Jones's palms. Jones resisted by pulling his hand away several times. Beal then told Jones that she would have to paddle him, and she retrieved her paddle from the classroom. She and Jones entered an empty classroom next door to Beal's classroom. Beal instructed Jones to touch his feet and Beal attempted to paddle Jones. Jones repeatedly moved to avoid the spanking, and at one point hegrabbed the paddle and attempted to take it away from Beal. As Jones moved, Beal struck him on the back of his thigh. According to Beal, she made no further attempt to paddle Jones, who then disobeyed Beal again by not returning to the fifth-grade classroom. According to Jones, Beal continued to strike him and he suffered injuries to one of his legs and an arm. The next day, Jones's mother removed Jones from Beatrice Elementary School and enrolled him in another school where he finished the fifth grade.
On February 26, 2008, Pamela Jones Al-Sulaibe, as next friend of Jones, sued the Board, asserting claims of negligent entrustment and negligent supervision. Jones also sued Beal, asserting claims of negligence, wantonness, and assault. According to Al-Sulaibe's complaint, Beal did not have good cause to discipline Jones, Beal did not first attempt to give Jones a "hand-paddling," and Beal struck Jones several times with the paddle, hitting his arm and leg. The Board and Beal answered, asserting immunity.
On August 31, 2009, the Board and Beal moved for a summary judgment. The Board asserted absolute immunity; Beal asserted State-agent, schoolmaster's, and statutory immunity. To support the motion, the Board and Beal submitted affidavits from Beal and her supervisors testifying that Beal acted at all times within the scope of her authority and in compliance with the Board's policies. Al-Sulaibe filed an opposing brief without supporting evidence and without addressing Beal's arguments regarding statutory and schoolmaster's immunity.
On November 4, 2008, the trial court summarily denied the Board and Beal's motion. The Board and Beal timely filed this petition for a writ of mandamus.
Ex parte Jackson County Bd. of Educ., 4 So.3d 1099, 1101-02 (Ala.2008). Additionally, in conducting our appellate review, we will consider only the factual material submitted to the trial court for its consideration in deciding the summary-judgment motion. Ex parte Madison County Bd. of Educ., 1 So.3d 980, 986 (Ala.2008).
The Board contends that the trial court erred in denying the motion for a summary judgment as to it because, it says, claims against the Board are barred by absolute immunity under Ala. Const. of 1901, § 14.
Ex parte Jackson County Bd. of Educ., 4 So.3d at 1102-03.
In Ex parte Hale County Board of Education, 14 So.3d 844 (Ala.2009), this Court revisited the issue whether county boards of education were immune from suit, overruling Sims v. Etowah County Board of Education, 337 So.2d 1310 (Ala.1976), and Kimmons v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 204 Ala. 384, 85 So. 774 (1920),and stating that "because county boards of education are local agencies of the State, they are clothed in constitutional immunity from suit" and that the immunity accorded a county board of education is absolute.
The Board is a local agency of the State that has absolute immunity under Ala. Const. of 1901, § 14. Therefore, the Board is entitled to a summary judgment and the trial court erred in denying the motion for a summary judgment as to the Board.
Next, Beal contends that the trial court erred in refusing to enter a summary judgment for her because, she says, Al-Sulaibe's claims against her are barred by State-agent immunity. Specifically, Beal contends that because she is certified by the State of Alabama as a school teacher, because, at the time of the incident with Jones, she was exercising her judgment in performing official duties for supervising and educating students, and because there is no evidence indicating that she exceeded her authority, she is entitled to State-agent immunity.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Perryman v. Wilcox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. (Ex parte Wilcox Cnty. Bd. of Educ.)
...[Montgomery County] Board [of Education] and a summary judgment entered on the tort claims against the Board"); Ex parte Monroe Cty. Bd. of Educ., 48 So.3d 621, 625 (Ala. 2010) (observing that the Monroe County Board of Education "is a local agency of the State that has absolute immunity un......
-
Barnett v. Baldwin Cnty. Bd. of Educ., Civil Action No. 13-0470-KD-M
...from tort actions." Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County v. Weaver, 99 So.3d 1210, 1217 (Ala.2012) (quoting Ex parte Monroe County Board of Education, 48 So.3d 621 (Ala.2010)); see Ex parte Bessemer Bd. of Educ., 68 So.3d 782, 789 (Ala.2011) ("Local school boards are agencies of theState......
-
Barnett v. Baldwin Cnty. Bd. of Educ.
...from tort actions.” Board of School Com'rs of Mobile County v. Weaver, 99 So.3d 1210, 1217 (Ala.2012) (quoting Ex parte Monroe County Board of Education, 48 So.3d 621 (Ala.2010) ); see Ex parte Bessemer Bd. of Educ., 68 So.3d 782, 789 (Ala.2011) (“Local school boards are agencies of the Sta......
-
Perryman v. Wilcox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. & Lester Turk (In re Wilcox Cnty. Bd. of Educ. & Lester Turk), 1170705
...County] Board [of Education] and a summary judgment entered on the tort claims against the Board"); Ex parte Monroe Cty. Bd. of Educ., 48 So. 3d 621, 625 (Ala. 2010) (observing that the Monroe County Board of Education "is a local agency of the State that has absolute immunity under Ala. Co......