H.S., In Interest of
Decision Date | 01 April 1991 |
Docket Number | No. A91A0258,A91A0258 |
Citation | 199 Ga.App. 481,405 S.E.2d 323 |
Parties | In the Interest of H.S., a child. |
Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Laurens C. Lee, for appellant.
Ralph M. Walke, Dist. Atty., L. Craig Fraser, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.
A delinquency petition was filed, alleging that appellant "did unlawfully, maliciously cause bodily harm to [the victim] by seriously disfiguring a member of his body, to wit: his head, in violation of OCGA § 16-5-24." A hearing on this petition was held and appellant appeals from the juvenile court's adjudication of delinquency.
Only the general grounds are raised in related enumerations of error. In juvenile proceedings, M. W. W. v. State of Ga., 136 Ga.App. 472, 474, 221 S.E.2d 669 (1975). The evidence in the instant case authorized a finding that, as the result of an unprovoked beating administered by appellant, the victim suffered a broken nose and a laceration to the scalp requiring several stitches. Accordingly, the evidence authorized a finding that the victim had incurred a serious disfigurement to his head as the result of being intentionally struck by appellant. Penland v. State, 229 Ga. 256(1), 190 S.E.2d 900 (1972); Price v. State, 160 Ga.App. 245(1), 286 S.E.2d 744 (1981); Thompson v. State, 156 Ga.App. 1(1), 273 S.E.2d 894 (1980); Miller v. State, 155 Ga.App. 54, 55(4), 270 S.E.2d 466 (1980); Rollins v. State, 154 Ga.App. 585, 588(5), 269 S.E.2d 81 (1980). "Black's Law Dictionary defines 'disfigurement' as 'that which impairs or injures ... the appearance of a person ...,' and defines 'serious' as 'grave, (or) great.' " Baker v. State, 246 Ga. 317, 318(2), 271 S.E.2d 360 (1980). To constitute the crime of aggravated battery, there is no requirement that, in addition to being "serious," the disfigurement of a victim be permanent. The evidence in this case demonstrates, at the very least, "serious temporary disfigurement to the victim...." (Emphasis supplied.) Baker v. State, 245 Ga. 657, 667(6), 266 S.E.2d 477 (1980). The juvenile court, as the trior of fact, was authorized to find from the evidence proof of appellant's delinquency beyond a reasonable doubt and the general grounds are, therefore, without merit. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Thornton v. State
...10, supra. The evidence is sufficient to support both the jury's finding that an aggravated battery occurred, In the Interest of H.S., 199 Ga.App. 481, 405 S.E.2d 323 (1991); Thompson v. State, 156 Ga.App. 1, 273 S.E.2d 894 (1980), and that the offense of murder was committed while Thornton......
-
Perkins v. State
...decide whether disfigurement is "serious" is correct statement of the law). 19. Id. at 127-128, 473 S.E.2d 582; In the Interest of H.S., 199 Ga.App. 481, 405 S.E.2d 323 (1991) (aggravated battery does not require that disfigurement be permanent). 20. Raulerson v. State, 268 Ga. 623, 632, 49......
-
Weaver v. State
...fracture with an "extremely deviated" septum and testified victim had bruising under each of her eyelids); In the Interest of H. S. , 199 Ga. App. 481, 405 S.E.2d 323 (1991) (where victim suffered a broken nose and a laceration to the scalp requiring several stitches, evidence authorized a ......
-
Bray v. State
...Ga.App. 134, 137(1)(a), 469 S.E.2d 318 (1996). See Baker v. State, 246 Ga. 317, 318(2), 271 S.E.2d 360 (1980) ; In the Interest of H.S., 199 Ga.App. 481, 405 S.E.2d 323 (1991). There is no requirement that the disfigurement be permanent. See Baker v. State, 245 Ga. 657, 667(6), 266 S.E.2d 4......