Heather Lyn Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Griswold
Citation | 38 Conn.App. 158,659 A.2d 740 |
Decision Date | 13 June 1995 |
Docket Number | No. 13432,13432 |
Parties | HEATHER LYN LIMITED PARTNERSHIP v. TOWN OF GRISWOLD et al. |
Court | Appellate Court of Connecticut |
Richard J. Duda, with whom was Mary Beth Duda, Jewett City, for appellants (defendants).
Richard J. Pascal, with whom, on the brief, was Lloyd L. Langhammer, Groton, for appellee (plaintiff).
Before FOTI, SCHALLER and FREDERICK A. FREEDMAN, JJ.
The defendants appeal from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, which was rendered on the plaintiff's complaint brought pursuant to General Statutes § 12-117a 1 for a reduction in the amount of the assessment and tax on a parcel of real property. The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court improperly reduced an assessment on the plaintiff's real property by adopting an appraisal method that was invalid as a matter of law. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. On July 1, 1987, the plaintiff purchased an apartment complex located at the corner of Brown Avenue and Russell Street in the town of Griswold. Thereafter, the plaintiff declared the twenty-six units as condominiums.
The plaintiff furnished the assessor of the town of Griswold with all of the information relevant to the assessment of the property. The assessor implemented, as of October 1, 1992, and October 1, 1993, a valuation of the condominium units for the town of Griswold at 70 percent of their alleged actual valuation. The plaintiff appealed to the town board of tax review for a reduction of the assessments made, but the board made no changes. On June 11, 1993, the plaintiff commenced this action against the defendants.
The defendant town of Griswold conducted a revaluation pursuant to General Statutes § 12-62 with the resulting values assessed on all property as of October 1, 1992. The plaintiff's premises were assessed at $37,450 per unit, 70 percent of $53,000, which the board determined to be the fair market value of each unit. Since the conversion to condominiums, six units have been sold. At the time of trial, all units were either available for rent or occupied as rental units. No units have been sold since October 1, 1992. A prior tax appeal concerning the premises with respect to the tax lists of October 1, 1988, October 1, 1989, and October 1, 1990, went to judgment on December 17, 1990. The trial court in that case found the true and actual fair market value of each unit to be $21,600.
At trial, the plaintiff's expert, Chris S. Buckley, testified that the fair market value of the twenty-six units appraised as residential condominiums for purchase by a single purchaser was $426,000; when appraised as residential apartments, the value was $920,000. Buckley employed a method of appraisal, which he called "the discounted cash flow developmental method of income capitalization," utilizing projections of sales for a period of eight years less expenses and discounting to a present value estimate. By that method, the fair market value of each unit was $16,385. An alternative value as rental apartments was also estimated using the "income capitalization approach" over a period of eight years. The trial court found Buckley's appraisal method "inherently credible when it relates the fair market value per unit to be $16,385 ... based on the discounted cash flow analysis." The trial court, however, gave "considerable weight" to the 1990 judgment in the prior tax appeal, and found the present fair market value of each unit to be $21,600, a figure identical to the value found by the trial court in 1990.
It is well established that "[i]n a case tried before a court, the trial judge is the sole arbiter of the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be given specific testimony." Kimberly-Clark Corp. v. Dubno, 204 Conn. 137, 153, 527 A.2d 679 (1987). The credibility and the weight of expert testimony is judged by the same standard, and the trial court "is privileged to adopt whatever testimony [the court] reasonably believes to be credible." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Transportation Plaza Associates v. Powers, 203 Conn. 364, 378, 525 A.2d 68 (1987). On appeal, we do not retry the facts or pass on the credibility of witnesses. Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc., 207 Conn. 468, 473, 542 A.2d 692 (1988).
Newbury Commons Limited Partnership v. Stamford, 226 Conn. 92, 99-100, 626 A.2d 1292 (1993). The conclusions reached by the trial court must stand "unless they are legally or logically inconsistent with the facts found or unless they involve the application of some erroneous rule of law." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Tucker v. Hartford, 15 Conn.App. 513, 517-18, 545 A.2d 584, cert. denied, 209 Conn. 807, 548 A.2d 444 (1988). We will not disturb the trial court's adoption of the plaintiff's valuation of the property, therefore, unless the appraisal was legally invalid.
General Statutes 12-63b(a) 2 provides for the following three methods of appraisal to be considered when determining the present true and actual value of real property for tax assessment in the absence of comparable sales: "(1) Replacement cost less depreciation, plus the market value of the land, (2) the gross income multiplier method as used for similar property and (3) capitalization of net income based on market rent for similar property."
At trial, the plaintiff's expert explained that he had used an income capitalization approach, the discounted cash flow method, using projected sales over eight years to obtain the fair market value of the property for October 1, 1992, and October 1, 1993. Newbury Commons Limited Partnership v. Stamford, supra, 226 Conn. at 100, 626 A.2d 1292. "The income capitalization approach to value consists of methods, techniques, and mathematical procedures that an appraiser uses to analyze a property's capacity to generate benefits (i.e., usually the monetary benefits of income and reversion) and convert these benefits into an indication of present value." Appraisal Institute, The Appraisal of Real Estate (10th Ed.1992) p. 409.
To determine if projected sales is an appropriate factor to be considered in determining value pursuant to the income capitalization method, we look to the plain language of § 12-63b(b). 3 (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Haesche v. Kissner, 229 Conn. 213, 223, 640 A.2d 89 (1994).
First Bethel Associates v. Bethel, 231 Conn. 731, 739-40, 651 A.2d 1279 (1995). The statute is clear and unambiguous in providing that market rent is the factor to be considered in a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pjm & Associates, Lc v. City of Bridgeport
...other] methods of appraisal" [emphasis added]), cert. denied, 265 Conn. 901, 829 A.2d 419 (2003); Heather Lyn Ltd. Partnership v. Griswold, 38 Conn.App. 158, 161-62, 659 A.2d 740 (1995) ("§ 12-63b[a] provides for ... three [other] methods of appraisal to be considered when determining the p......
-
Wheelabrator Bridgeport, L.P. v. City of Bridgeport
...property" under the income capitalization approach to valuation. (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Heather Lyn Ltd. Partnership v. Griswold, 38 Conn.App. 158, 162, 659 A.2d 740 (1995) ; see also Newbury Commons Ltd. Partnership v. Stamford, 226 Conn. 92, 100, 626 A.2d 1292 (1993) ; Apprai......
-
Kawa v. Town of Hartland, No. CV-03-00090729-S (Conn. Super. 3/29/2004)
...testimony [the court] reasonably believes to be credible." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Heather Lyn Ltd. Partnership v. Town of Griswold, 38 Conn.App. 153, 659 A.2d 740, 659 (1996). It is generally agreed, that the fair market value of real property is best ascertained, by reference ......
-
Sun Valley Camping Co-Op., Inc. v. Stafford
...involve more than one single theory or methodology of assessment because of the particular facts. Heather Lyn Ltd. Partership v. Griswold, 38 Conn. App. 158, 164, 659 A.2d 740 (1995). It is for the court on remand to determine the appropriate method for a determination of the true and actua......