Peters v. City of New York Health and Hospitals Corporation

Decision Date26 February 2008
Docket Number2618.
Citation48 A.D.3d 329,2008 NY Slip Op 01613,851 N.Y.S.2d 527
PartiesEDNA POTTS PETERS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION et al., Defendants, and VICTOR MARIANI, M.D., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.)
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

By submitting its expert's affidavit of merit and a reasonable explanation for the delay in seeking substitution, decedent's estate showed adequate cause why this medical malpractice action should not have been dismissed for failure to timely move for substitution (seeCPLR 1015 [a]; 1021).Moreover, the strong public policy of this State is to dispose of matters on the merits (...

To continue reading

Request your trial

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions

  • AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

vLex
12 cases
  • Public Adm'r v. Levine
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Agosto 2016
    ...light of the strong public policy favoring disposition of cases such as this one on their merits (Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527 [1st Dept.2008] ; Noriega, 305 A.D.2d at 221, 761 N.Y.S.2d 18 ), and “our liberal policy to permit amended pleading......
  • Tokar v. Weissberg
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 25 Julio 2018
    ...v. Diallo, 156 A.D.3d at 665, 64 N.Y.S.3d 563 ; Public Adm'r v. Levine, 142 A.D.3d 467, 37 N.Y.S.3d 475 ; Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527 ; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94 ). Further, Stanley sufficiently dem......
  • Largo-Chicaiza v. Westchester Scaffold Equip. Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 13 Diciembre 2011
    ...the third-party defendant suffered no prejudice by the Supreme Court's granting of the motion ( see Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94; Noriega v. Presbyterian Hosp. in......
  • Williams v. Hertz Vehicles, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • 4 Marzo 2020
    ...2013]), and it is the strong public policy of this State to dispose of matters on their merits (see Peters v. City of New York Health and Hospitals Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329 [1st Dept. 2008]). Neo Defendants' motion, therefore, will be denied without prejudice, and Plaintiffs will be directed to......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT