Peters v. City of New York Health and Hospitals Corporation
Decision Date | 26 February 2008 |
Docket Number | 2618. |
Citation | 48 A.D.3d 329,2008 NY Slip Op 01613,851 N.Y.S.2d 527 |
Parties | EDNA POTTS PETERS, Respondent, v. CITY OF NEW YORK HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION et al., Defendants, and VICTOR MARIANI, M.D., Appellant. (And a Third-Party Action.) |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
By submitting its expert's affidavit of merit and a reasonable explanation for the delay in seeking substitution, decedent's estate showed adequate cause why this medical malpractice action should not have been dismissed for failure to timely move for substitution (seeCPLR 1015 [a]; 1021).Moreover, the strong public policy of this State is to dispose of matters on the merits (...
To continue reading
Request your trialUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete case access with no limitations or restrictions
-
AI-generated case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Comprehensive legal database spanning 100+ countries and all 50 states
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Verified citations and treatment with CERT citator technology

Start Your 7-day Trial
12 cases
-
Public Adm'r v. Levine
...light of the strong public policy favoring disposition of cases such as this one on their merits (Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527 [1st Dept.2008] ; Noriega, 305 A.D.2d at 221, 761 N.Y.S.2d 18 ), and “our liberal policy to permit amended pleading......
-
Tokar v. Weissberg
...v. Diallo, 156 A.D.3d at 665, 64 N.Y.S.3d 563 ; Public Adm'r v. Levine, 142 A.D.3d 467, 37 N.Y.S.3d 475 ; Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527 ; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94 ). Further, Stanley sufficiently dem......
-
Largo-Chicaiza v. Westchester Scaffold Equip. Corp.
...the third-party defendant suffered no prejudice by the Supreme Court's granting of the motion ( see Peters v. City of N.Y. Health & Hosps. Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329, 329, 851 N.Y.S.2d 527; Wynter v. Our Lady of Mercy Med. Ctr., 3 A.D.3d 376, 378, 771 N.Y.S.2d 94; Noriega v. Presbyterian Hosp. in......
-
Williams v. Hertz Vehicles, LLC
...2013]), and it is the strong public policy of this State to dispose of matters on their merits (see Peters v. City of New York Health and Hospitals Corp., 48 A.D.3d 329 [1st Dept. 2008]). Neo Defendants' motion, therefore, will be denied without prejudice, and Plaintiffs will be directed to......
Request a trial to view additional results