State v. Phillips
Citation | 226 S.C. 297,84 S.E.2d 855 |
Decision Date | 02 December 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 16935,16935 |
Court | United States State Supreme Court of South Carolina |
Parties | The STATE, Respondent, v. Robert J. PHILLIPS, Appellant. |
Leatherwood, Walker, Todd & Mann, Greenville, for appellant.
Hubert E. Nolin, Sol., Greenville, for respondent.
Appellant, Robert J. Phillips, was convicted of the offense of reckless homicide in the County Court for Greenville County at the November, 1953, term of such Court, and appeals upon exceptions which present two questions, but this Court deems it necessary to pass only upon the question of whether or not the County Court of Greenville has jurisdiction to try a defendant upon an indictment charging violation of Section 46-341 of the 1952 Code of Laws for South Carolina, commonly referred to as the offense of reckless homicide.
Under Article 5, Section 1, Constitution of the State of South Carolina, 1895, and under Section 15-612 of the Code of Laws for South Carolina, 1952, county courts shall have jurisdiction to try criminal cases except cases of murder, manslaughter, rape or attempt to rape, arson, common law burglary, bribery, or perjury. Such offenses are also excluded from the jurisdiction of the County Court of Greenville under Section 15-655, Code of Laws for South Carolina, 1952.
For a history of the crime of involuntary manslaughter, see the following cases: State v. Barnett, 218 S.C. 415, 63 S.E.2d 57, and the cases therein cited; State v. Brown, 205 S.C. 514, 32 S.C.2d 825; State v. Staggs, 186 S.C. 151, 195 S.E. 130; State v. Dixon, 181 S.C. 1, 186 S.E. 531; State v. Dickerson, 179 S.C. 239, 184 S.E. 585; State v. Portee, 122 S.C. 298, 115 S.E. 238; State v. Martin, 122 S.C. 286, 115 S.E. 252; State v. Hanahan, 111 S.C. 58, 96 S.E. 667.
From the foregoing cases, it has been determined that in this State an individual may be guilty of involuntary manslaughter when death arises out of the negligent operation of a motor vehicle, the said motor vehicle being considered a dangerous instrumentality. This doctrine was derived from an analogy between the negligent use of a motor vehicle and the negligent handling of a deadly weapon. State v. McLaughlin, 208 S.C. 462, 38 S.E.2d 492; State v. Quick, 168 S.C. 76, 167 S.E. 19; State v. McCalla, 101 S.C. 303, 85 S.E. 720; State v. Badgett, 87 S.C. 543, 70 S.E. 301; State v. Causer, 87 S.C. 516, 70 S.E. 161; State v. Tucker, 86 S.C. 211, 68 S.E. 523; State v. Revels, 86 S.C. 213, 68 S.E. 523; State v. Gilliam, 66 S.C. 419, 45 S.E. 6.
It is without question that such Courts shall not be invested with jurisdiction to try cases of murder, manslaughter, etc., as it is clearly beyond the power of the Legislature to so provide either by express terms or implication; and the Legislature in adopting the 'reckless homicide' statute, in our opinion, had no intention of so doing. The following language was used in State v. Barnett, supra [218 S.C. 415, 63 S.E.2d 62], which is some indication of the Court's reasoning in such cases:
The elements of manslaughter and reckless homicide are the same with the exception of the degree of negligence required and the punishment. In order to sustain a conviction of involuntary manslaughter, the State need show only simple negligence, but something more than the mere failure to exercise due care is required to sustain a charge of reckless homicide. The punishment for involuntary manslaughter is not more than three years, while in reckless homicide, the punishment may be five years imprisonment, a fine of five thousand dollars, and revocation of defendant's driver's license for a period of five years. In State v. Causer, supra,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
DeLee v. Knight
...death. The State had to prove heedlessness or willfulness; mere negligence does not support the conviction. See State v. Phillips, 226 S.C. 297, 84 S.E.2d 855 (1954); State v. Jenkins, supra, both dealing with reckless homicide. S.C.Code (1962), § 46--341 which deals with 'reckless disregar......
-
State v. White
...gun causing death will support a verdict for involuntary manslaughter. The foregoing rules were restated and approved in State v. Phillips, 226 S.C. 297, 84 S.E.2d 855. The appellant charges error on the part of the trial judge in allowing the indictment for murder to go to the jury after h......
-
Sanders v. Leeke, 19081
...be a plea of guilty to manslaughter under an indictment for murder has been answered in the affirmative in the case of State v. Phillips, 226 S.C. 297, 84 S.E.2d 855. Therefore, the contention that it was incumbent upon the State to change the indictments for murder to that of manslaughter ......
-
State v. Caldwell
...homicide cases. If a change or modification is desirable, it should come from the law-making body.' The opinion in State v. Phillips, 226 S.C. 297, 84 S.E.2d 855, by Mr. Justice Taylor, cites the Barnett case and contains a catalog of the earlier relevant decisions. From it we quote: 'From ......